2008 Joint Meeting of The Geological Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies with the Gulf Coast Section of SEPM

Paper No. 11
Presentation Time: 8:00 AM-6:00 PM

Deriving Both Areas and Boundaries of Groundwater Catchments from Radar-Rainfall and Discharge Records in Puerto Rico


ORTIZ RIVERA, Veronica del Mar, Geology, University of Puerto Rico, PO Box 9017, Mayaguez, PR 00681 and MILLER, Thomas E., Department of Geology, Univ of Puerto Rico @ Mayagüez, POB 9017, Mayagüez, PR 00681, tmiller@uprm.edu

Discharges from three USGS gaging stations (2003-2006) were correlated with areal rainfall obtained from a NEXRAD Doppler radar site 70 km to the east, and used to outline subsurface flow boundaries in the Northern Karst of Puerto Rico. USGS gage #50028000 records the flow (annual mean 1.4 cms) of the Río Tanamá draining an upland catchment (47 km2) developed on volcaniclastics; the gage is located at the boundary of a mature holokarst. The river traverses nine caves as it passes through the karst, and its flow is then recorded at USGS gage #50028400 (mean 2.8 cms), coinciding with its exit from the karst. The difference between the station discharges represents the total influx of groundwater flow in that karst catchment.

When a discharge event was recorded at a gage, radar-rainfall (RR) of the preceding 24 hours was integrated with previous RR amounts associated with other discharge events- using GIS software- to produce an evolving hyetograph image of the local region (about 450 km2). The hypothesis was that a summed sequence of causal precipitation events would highlight and identify those areas contributing to discharge at a gage point.

This procedure was used to establish boundaries between the Tanamá karst catchment and the neighboring karst of the Río Camuy to the west, recorded at gage #50014800 (mean 3.1 cms). RR hyetographs were produced from 11 discharge events that occurred on the Tanamá, but which were absent or minimal on the Camuy, and for 7 discharge events that occurred on the Camuy but not on the Tanamá. The resulting hyetographs corresponded with several known limits of the catchment boundaries, showed a clear separation between the two groundwater catchments (core areas of about 30 and 50 km2 respectively), and provided hydrogeological detail about the local influence of non-permeable layers, evapotranspiration, and rain-runoff lag times.