|2009 Portland GSA Annual Meeting (18-21 October 2009)|
|Paper No. 91-1|
|Presentation Time: 8:05 AM-8:20 AM|
SYNTHESIS OF RESEARCH ON THINKING & LEARNING IN THE GEOSCIENCES: ARTICULATING THE NATURE OF GEOSCIENCE
MANDUCA, Cathryn A., Science Education Resource Center, Carleton College, Northfield, MN 55057, email@example.com and KASTENS, Kim A., Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964-8000|
A more careful articulation of the strengths of our discipline, the characteristics of its scientific approach, and the nature of geoscience expertise may help geoscientists better explain themselves to the larger population of scientists, policy makers, and citizens. Like most other modern sciences geoscience is not easily classified as quantitative, qualitative, experimental or historical, but rather integrates these methods to address questions about the Earth system. Methods of proof in the geosciences rest heavily on comparing explanation to observation drawing across multiple cases, scales, and lines of evidence (including results derived from experiments and models). While individual geoscientists have a wide range of skills and expertise, they are united by a set of common perspectives that both characterize their approach and foster collaboration. These perspectives provide a framework in which phenomena are understood as complex systems, as integrated into a long (4.5+ billion year) history that allows for slow processes to have major impacts but also includes short, catastrophic changes, and as taking place in a context where the specific geographic, spatial and temporal circumstances are important. Collaboration, which is essential to testing hypotheses across cases and with multiple converging lines of evidence, is facilitated by this shared perspective. While the characteristics or skills that geoscientists bring to the table can be found in scientists in other disciplines, the specific combination of observation, argumentation and collaboration used by geoscientists to address questions about the Earth is instructive not only in solving scientific problems but in providing insight into how humans can understand complex systems, how compelling arguments can be made with incomplete data, and how a collaborative culture can extend the capacity for human problem solving.
2009 Portland GSA Annual Meeting (18-21 October 2009)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 91|
The Nature of Geoscience Expertise
Oregon Convention Center: B117/118/119
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Monday, 19 October 2009
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 41, No. 7, p. 249
© Copyright 2009 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.