|2009 Portland GSA Annual Meeting (18-21 October 2009)|
|Paper No. 91-2|
|Presentation Time: 8:20 AM-8:35 AM|
SYNTHESIS OF RESEARCH ON THINKING & LEARNING IN THE GEOSCIENCES: DEVELOPING REPRESENTATIONAL COMPETENCE
KASTENS, Kim A., Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964-8000, firstname.lastname@example.org and MANDUCA, Cathryn A., Science Education Resource Center, Carleton College, Northfield, MN 55057|
Representational competence is facility in the use of graphs, maps, tables, diagrams, flowcharts and other non-verbal modes of expression to record and convey observations and interpretations, and to extract insights from such representations when they are used by others. Human's ability to turn observations into representations is what makes it possible to study something as large, heterogeneous, and dynamic as the Earth, using eyes and brains that can only be in one place at a time. Visual representations leverage human's evolved ability to recall, detect, match, and infer significance from patterns in our visually-perceived environment. Based on a tally of illustrations, equations and tables per hundred words of text in major professional journals, geoscientists use representations to communicate with their peers more extensively than do professionals in other social or natural sciences. Thus developing representational competence is an important aspect of developing geoscience expertise. We identify three components of representational competence in geoscience. First is learning to read and write geoscientists' conventional representations, such as the stratigrapher's timeline, the structural geologist's stereonet, and the physical oceanographer's temperature/salinity diagram. Second is metacognitive understanding of the nature of representations, including: representations are made by a person for a purpose and selectively exclude those aspects of the referent that are not useful for that purpose; concept-driven visualizations comingle universal truths and conditional truths; and the ideal representation for communicating an idea to readers or viewers is seldom the same representation that was optimized for capturing information or analyzing data. The third and most challenging component is being able to combine understanding of the Earth system and knowledge of representational strategies so as to invent suitable representations to record and convey novel concepts or observation types.
2009 Portland GSA Annual Meeting (18-21 October 2009)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 91|
The Nature of Geoscience Expertise
Oregon Convention Center: B117/118/119
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Monday, 19 October 2009
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 41, No. 7, p. 249
© Copyright 2009 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.