2009 Portland GSA Annual Meeting (18-21 October 2009)
Paper No. 251-8
Presentation Time: 9:00 AM-6:00 PM


YAGER, Douglas B., U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, MS 973, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, dyager@usgs.gov, MANNING, Andrew H., U.S. Geological Survey, Denver Federal Center, M.S. 973, Denver, CO 80225-0046, VIGER, R.J., U.S. Geological Survey, Denver Federal Center, Lakewood, CO 80225, CAINE, Jonathan Saul, U.S. Geological Survey, P.O. Box 25046, MS 964, Denver, CO 80225-0046, and SMITH, Kathleen S., U.S. Geol Survey, Box 25046, Denver Federal Center, M.S. 964, Denver, CO 80225-0046

One objective of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Mineral Environmental Assessment project is to develop tools for predicting the potential impacts of future mining on water quality. We are developing an empirical modeling approach, employing GIS and statistical analyses to better define the relative importance of physical watershed variables that might control acid-rock drainage. Data for analyses were acquired as part of a USGS, abandoned mine lands study conducted in the Silverton, Colo. area between 1996 and 2002. A GIS software system (the USGS, GIS Weasel), which interfaces with commands available in ArcGrid™ was used to analyze a digital terrain model and delineate a hydrologic network and corresponding catchments. Grids of alteration type, geology, and vegetation were analyzed to determine geographic intersections between 48 catchments, and corresponding hydrologic networks. These analyses permit area calculations for alteration type, geologic unit, vegetation, and alteration types adjacent to streams that were defined using a GIS buffer. Catchment characteristics (slope, aspect, stream length, drainage density) were also calculated. Statistically-based comparisons between catchments reveal potentially important information about processes controlling acid-rock drainage. For example, less-acidic to neutral catchments (pH 5.5 and higher) have median propylitic areas that are 1.5 times greater than acidic catchments (pH 5.5 and lower). This is probably due to the acid neutralizing capacity of the propylitic mineral assemblage (calcite, chlorite, and epidote). Correlations between (a) surface water geochemistry acquired for samples collected at the mouth of catchments at base flow and (b) catchment physical properties, such as areas of geologic units and alteration types were evaluated statistically. Simple linear regression, comparing pH (response) and multiple (predictor) variables indicate that the total area of quartz-sericite-pyrite (QSP) has the highest correlation when compared to all other study area alteration types and to buffered area of QSP alteration along streams. These analyses suggest that total alteration area and not just area of alteration intersecting primary streams is an important factor influencing pH and thus, metal influx to streams.

2009 Portland GSA Annual Meeting (18-21 October 2009)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 251--Booth# 240
Contaminant Hydrogeology: Contaminant Fate and Transport in Geological Systems (Posters)
Oregon Convention Center: Hall A
9:00 AM-6:00 PM, Wednesday, 21 October 2009

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 41, No. 7, p. 652

© Copyright 2009 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.