2009 Portland GSA Annual Meeting (18-21 October 2009)

Paper No. 6
Presentation Time: 9:00 AM-6:00 PM

COEVAL 40AR/39AR, U-PB, AND ASTRONOMICAL CLOCKS IN THE EARLY EOCENE


SMITH, M. Elliot, Department of Geology, Sonoma State University, 1801 E Cotati Ave, Rohnert Park, CA 94928, CHAMBERLAIN, K., Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wyoming, 1100 University Ave, Laramie, WY 82071, SINGER, Brad S., Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1215 West Dayton St, Madison, WI 53076 and CARROLL, Alan R., Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1215 West Dayton St, Madison, WI 53706, michael.smith@sonoma.edu

U-Pb ages of zircon from the Analcite and Firehole ash beds in the Eocene Green River Formation are indistinguishable from 40Ar/39Ar ages of sanidine in the same beds after adjusting the latter to the astronomically-calibrated age of 28.201 Ma for Fish Canyon sanidine standard. Seven of eight analyses of zircon from the Analcite ash zircon yield a weighted mean 238U-206Pb age of 49.23 ± 0.18 Ma (MSWD = 6.7; full external 2σ uncertainty) whereas the sanidine 40Ar/39Ar age is 49.24 ± 0.18 Ma (full external 2σ uncertainty). Six out of nine zircon analyses from the Firehole ash yield concordant ages in an overlapping cluster and give a weighted mean 238U-206Pb age of 51.66 ± 0.25 Ma (MSWD = 11.2), indistinguishable from the recalibrated 40Ar/39Ar age of 51.40 ± 0.25 Ma. High MSWD values for U-Pb ages likely reflect some combination of minor inheritance, Pb-loss, and possibly magma chamber residence. Synchronized U-Pb and 40Ar/39Ar ages provide and improved means of testing recent time series analyses of the Wilkins Peak Member of the Green River Formation. Calibrating Green River Formation 40Ar/39Ar ages to the 28.201 Ma age for Fish Canyon sanidine permits the first direct comparison of the Green River Formation to the Laskar et al. (2004) astronomical solution for Early Eocene insolation. From this comparison, it appears that the long and short eccentricity cycles exerted a primary influence on deposition of carbonate versus siliciclastic facies.