UNROOFING FRANCISCAN BLUESCHISTS
The tectonic significance of regional belts of blueschist facies rocks is different from that of the isolated tectonic blocks of high-grade blueschist, garnet amphibolite, and eclogite. Blueschist and eclogites that occur as blocks are more likely to have experienced a multi-process tectonic unroofing and reworking history. For example, blueschist bearing-serpentinite diapirs have been documented in the Great Valley and Marianna forearc. Likewise, blocks transported by serpentinite diapires intrude forearc and accretion complexes, then have been redeposited by olistostromes and mass flow deposits. Blueschist and eclogitic blocks are also found in association with the basal tectonized zone underlying arc-related assemblages of the hanging-wall of the subduction zone.
Curiously, blueschists are not exposed where there has been the most continuously active subduction. It seems that while blueschist and eclogite facies rocks form in subduction zones, their exposure as regionally extensive belts may primarily be controlled by perturbations in subduction. The timing of their exhumation represents a change in the plate boundary resulting from collision of oceanic islands, island arcs, or continental crust; or a change to highly oblique convergence. So to summarize: Blueschist facies rocks are not common along active, unobstructed subduction margins. They are common in active collision zones, obliquely convergent margins, seamount or otherwise obstructed subduction, & active transform plate boundaries. Blueschist facies rocks have not been documented in active subduction complexes where normal faulting and extensional collapse of actively growing accretionary wedges are imaged.