MODES OF FLOW IN THE OROGENIC INFRASTRUCTURE: THE EXAMPLE OF THE CENTRAL GNEISS
followed by Phase 2 infrastructural flow of ductile nappes detached from a
stiff superstructure. The CGB cross section comprises a stack of lower crustal
nappes interlayered during Phase 2 with sheets of ductile mid-crust. The
regional map pattern shows resistant lumps derived from lower crustal nappes
containing relict Phase 1 structures, enveloped by sinuous Phase 2 gneiss &
km-scale transport-direction parallel folds formed from either ductile
nappe-carapaces or mid-crustal gneiss.
Whereas most gneisses are compositionally similar granitoids, their structural
fate & mode of flow in Phase 2 is dependant on differences in rheology
determined by one or more factors. For example the inherited pre-orogenic state
may be crucial, thus rocks not metamorphosed before the Grenville orogeny were
fertile with respect to development of abundant ductility-enhancing leucosome
in Phase 1 & 2. In contrast, infertile lithologies were melted in an earlier
orogeny or attained granulite facies in Phase 1 & thus, in Phase 2, formed
resistant lumps or competent members in folded multilayers. Formation of a
ductile carapace of transposed Phase 1 gneiss around some of these resisters
was accomplished by addition of water mediated by pegmatite intrusion. The
pegmatites may have originated from the leucosome-rich fertile lithologies and
given that the latter themselves needed water added to be melted & that the
majority of Phase 2 structures had the same requirement, an ultimately
exogenous origin is postulated for this fluid. Another important mode of Phase
2 is buckle-&-shear deformation which was responsible for large & small
transport direction folds. This mode was dependant on the presence of layering
anisotropy developed during Phase 1 through homogenous deformation of
compositionally variable protolith or by interlayering of fertile- (incompetent
when migmatised) & competent infertile gneiss layers.