Northeastern Section - 44th Annual Meeting (22–24 March 2009)

Paper No. 6
Presentation Time: 2:40 PM

MODES OF FLOW IN THE OROGENIC INFRASTRUCTURE: THE EXAMPLE OF THE CENTRAL GNEISS


CULSHAW, Nicholas, Earth Sciences, Dalhousie Univ, 3006 Life Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS B3H 4J1, Canada and GERBI, Christopher, School of Earth and Climate Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, culshaw@dal.ca

A tectonic model for the Central Gneiss Belt (CGB) has Phase 1 orogenic thickening

followed by Phase 2 infrastructural flow of ductile nappes detached from a

stiff superstructure. The CGB cross section comprises a stack of lower crustal

nappes interlayered during Phase 2 with sheets of ductile mid-crust. The

regional map pattern shows resistant lumps derived from lower crustal nappes

containing relict Phase 1 structures, enveloped by sinuous Phase 2 gneiss &

km-scale transport-direction parallel folds formed from either ductile

nappe-carapaces or mid-crustal gneiss.

Whereas most gneisses are compositionally similar granitoids, their structural

fate & mode of flow in Phase 2 is dependant on differences in rheology

determined by one or more factors. For example the inherited pre-orogenic state

may be crucial, thus rocks not metamorphosed before the Grenville orogeny were

fertile with respect to development of abundant ductility-enhancing leucosome

in Phase 1 & 2. In contrast, infertile lithologies were melted in an earlier

orogeny or attained granulite facies in Phase 1 & thus, in Phase 2, formed

resistant lumps or competent members in folded multilayers. Formation of a

ductile carapace of transposed Phase 1 gneiss around some of these resisters

was accomplished by addition of water mediated by pegmatite intrusion. The

pegmatites may have originated from the leucosome-rich fertile lithologies and

given that the latter themselves needed water added to be melted & that the

majority of Phase 2 structures had the same requirement, an ultimately

exogenous origin is postulated for this fluid. Another important mode of Phase

2 is buckle-&-shear deformation which was responsible for large & small

transport direction folds. This mode was dependant on the presence of layering

anisotropy developed during Phase 1 through homogenous deformation of

compositionally variable protolith or by interlayering of fertile- (incompetent

when migmatised) & competent infertile gneiss layers.