Rocky Mountain Section - 61st Annual Meeting (11-13 May 2009)
Paper No. 10-6
Presentation Time: 9:45 AM-10:05 AM


HENRY, Christopher D.1, FAULDS, James E.1, HINZ, Nicholas H.1, GARSIDE, Larry J.2, and BODEN, David R.3, (1) Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557,, (2) Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada Reno, MS 178, Reno, NV 89557, (3) Physical Sciences, Truckee Meadows Community College, Reno, NV 89512

Myron Best has been a leader in studying ash-flow tuffs of the ignimbrite flareup, the most voluminous volcanic rocks of the Great Basin. His contributions to understanding the character, distribution, sources, and volumes of these rocks have been essential in resolving both the magmatic-tectonic history of the region and magmatic-tectonic processes in general. Our mapping, geochronology, and paleomagnetism document that individual 31-23 Ma ash-flow tuffs of the western Great Basin commonly flowed as much as 200 km (estimated pre-extension distance) from sources in the central NV caldera belt. Enormous, preferentially westward flow distances resulted from focusing flow in paleovalleys that drained westward toward the Pacific Ocean, in the Great Valley at the time, with a probable north-trending paleodivide through east-central NV. Paleovalley flow inhibited radial dispersion and cooling by mixing with air. The paleovalleys were deep (0.5-1.5 km) but broad (commonly 8-10 km) and separated by relatively low-relief interfluves, consistent with a "high" but mature Nevadaplano as proposed by many. The Sierra Nevada constituted only a western flank to this high plateau in the mid-Cenozoic. Tuffs at least as young as the correlative, 23.1 Ma tuff of Toiyabe/Santiago Canyon Tuff from the Toiyabe caldera flowed these great distances, which precludes significant disruption of the paleovalleys by either normal or strike-slip faulting pre-23 Ma. Preferential flow and deposition of tuffs in paleovalleys resulted in highly asymmetric distributions, offset westward from source calderas, and having thicknesses that decrease very irregularly with distance from source. These complexities hinder calculation of eruption volumes but imply much lesser volumes than if the tuffs were assumed to have spread more radially. The best way to estimate erupted volumes is probably from the area and amount of collapse of source calderas. For example, the 27.1 Ma Mickey Pass Tuff, which flowed ~210 km from its source in the Toquima caldera complex, is as much as 300 m thick 150 km from source, which could imply an implausible, radially determined volume of about 21,000 km3 (V=πr2t=π1502x0.3). The ~400 km2 caldera has probably undergone several km of collapse, suggesting a more realistic V=1200-1600 km3.

Rocky Mountain Section - 61st Annual Meeting (11-13 May 2009)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 10
Magmatism from the Mesozoic to the Present in the Great Basin and Colorado Plateaus: A Tribute to the Career of Myron G. Best
Utah Valley University: LI 212
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Tuesday, 12 May 2009

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 41, No. 6, p. 18

© Copyright 2009 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.