AGES AND PROVENANCE OF DETRITAL MINERALS, TRIASSIC DOCKUM GROUP, TEXAS PANHANDLE
On a Rb-Sr isochron diagram, data from 26 muscovite samples (0.6 to 15 milligrams) resolve into two linear regressions corresponding to (i) t = 338 ± 6 Ma, Ri = 0.722 ± 003, and (ii) t = 371 ± 1.4 Ma, Ri = 0.7093 ± 0.0003. Population (i) muscovite, with a wide range of Rb/Sr and a radiogenic protolith, was deposited low in the stratigraphic sequence. Population (ii) muscovite, with uniformly low Rb/Sr and a less radiogenic protolith, was deposited higher in the sequence. A muscovite isochron age (n = 5) from the Llano Uplift is 1.16 ± 0.02 Ga. There is no hint of mixing between Llano and Dockum muscovite populations.
Detrital biotite is weathered, the freshest sample providing a model Rb-Sr age of 225 Ma, which is the age of Dockum deposition. Laser-ablation U-Pb ages of Cooper Canyon detrital zircons are clustered in the range of the muscovite Rb-Sr ages, but also with upward streaking to mid-Proterozoic values.
Ages of Dockum clastic detritus, deposited in a vertical sequence of 170 meters and over a lateral distance exceeding 460 kilometers, exhibit a consistent pattern of provenance. The Ouachita Interior Zone supplied abundant muscovite and zircon, as younger (~338 Ma) more radiogenic rocks were unroofed, followed by older (~371 Ma) less radiogenic metamorphic rocks. Yet older zircon suggests that Paleozoic sedimentary rocks in the Ouachita Frontal Zone were a subordinate source. Biotite is from contemporaneous volcanism. The Llano Uplift was not a significant source for Dockum sediments.