2010 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (31 October 3 November 2010)
Paper No. 65-3
Presentation Time: 2:15 PM-2:30 PM


WILSON, Mark A.1, AVNI, Yoav2, RISACHER, Micah3, RETZLER, Andrew1, and CHUBB, Stuart4, (1) Dept of Geology, The College of Wooster, 944 College Mall, Wooster, OH 44691-2363, mwilson@wooster.edu, (2) Geological Survey of Israel, 30 Malkhe Israel St, Jerusalem, 95501, Israel, (3) Dept of Geology, The College of Wooster, Wooster, OH 44691, (4) Dept of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom

Hiatus cobbles have been significant substrates for boring and encrusting organisms through the Phanerozoic. They provide large, relatively stable calcareous surfaces in systems where sedimentation is minimal. Diverse sclerobiont communities have inhabited hiatus cobbles since the Cambrian, so they have been important contributors to our understanding of the evolution of these ecological systems. Here we review hiatus cobble formation and colonization, and then describe an example from southern Israel where hiatus cobbles are critical for interpreting the paleoenvironment of an Upper Cretaceous sedimentary sequence. These cobbles are found at the base of the Menuha Formation (Santonian, Mount Scopus Group) unconformably above the top of the Zihor Formation (Turonian-Coniacian, Judea Group) exposed in the Makhtesh Ramon region of the Negev Highlands. The cobbles are almost entirely composed of micritic limestone, and many are exhumed cemented burrow-fills apparently from 10-20 meters of upper Zihor Formation strata removed by erosion. There are also a few cobbles of dolomitic limestone and rare vertebrate bone. The average cobble is roughly 1000 cubic centimeters in volume, and many are exhumed cemented burrow-fills. The cobbles are moderately to heavily bored by bivalves (producing Gastrochaenolites) and worms (forming Trypanites), and some have remnant attachments of oysters. They are densely arrayed in a single layer, often touching each other or only a few centimeters apart. The sclerobionts associated with the cobbles, along with their hydrodynamic arrangement, strongly suggest that these cobbles accumulated in very shallow water above normal wavebase. Most of them (77%) are encrusted on their top surfaces only, indicating that they were bored in place and not later delivered to a deeper environment by submarine currents. The rest of the Menuha Formation above is a chalk with relatively few macrofossils (primarily shark teeth and oysters) and a few trace fossils (Planolites and Thalassinoides are the most common). Sorting out its depositional environment has been contentious, but the hiatus cobbles show that at least the initial deposits were in very shallow water. This has important implications for the development of the Syrian Arc structures in this region, especially the Ramon Monocline.

2010 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (31 October 3 November 2010)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 65
Common Approaches to Investigating Patterns and Processes of Bioerosion across Substrates
Colorado Convention Center: Room 302
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Sunday, 31 October 2010

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 42, No. 5, p. 163

© Copyright 2010 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.