2010 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (31 October –3 November 2010)
Paper No. 57-12
Presentation Time: 4:50 PM-5:05 PM


CAINE, Jonathan Saul, U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, DFC, MS 964, Denver, CO 80225-0046, jscaine@usgs.gov and MANNING, Andrew H., U.S. Geological Survey, P.O. Box 25046, Mail Stop 973, Denver, CO 80225-0046

Polymetallic fault veins are structures that can control mine drainage and associated metal contamination of surface and groundwaters common in the intermountain west. The Standard Mine is a Superfund Site where a network of fault veins host precious and base metal sulfide deposits and hydrothermal alteration. Characterization of these structures was performed to assist the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in evaluating their impacts on the groundwater flow system and remediation options for the site.

Key observations include: (1) distinctive fault zones collocated with mine workings cut polymetallic quartz veins and have clay-rich fault cores; (2) sulfides are concentrated in fault veins compared with disseminated pyrite in the surrounding aquifer also containing pervasive iron-oxide stained joints; (3) discrete groundwater flow in the mine has asymmetrically deposited flowstone on the footwall; (4) preferential leaching of pyrite at the surface occurs more commonly in the footwall (Upper Cretaceous Ohio Creek Member, Koc) compared with the hanging wall (Tertiary Wasatch Formation, Tw); and (5) permeametry indicates relatively high intergranular porosity and permeability (k) in Koc versus clay-rich gouge and Tw.

A hydrogeological conceptual model includes: (1) the Standard fault vein as the primary source of solutes; (2) relatively high k joints versus low intergranular k controls groundwater flow to the mine from the greater watershed; (3) juxtaposition of possibly lower k Tw against Koc, combined with low k clay-rich fault gouge, likely controls groundwater flow near and in the mine workings; and (4) given the character of joint networks, fault rocks and juxtaposition, watershed geomorphology, and potential variation in surface versus subsurface hydraulic gradients relative to the orientation of the fault vein, it appears the fault vein does not act as a simple conduit allowing near-surface groundwater to drain directly downward into the mine workings. Rather, the fault vein appears to act as an asymmetric, combined conduit-barrier to groundwater flow, where flow likely occurs from the surface to the mine workings within joint networks from the greater volume of the bedrock aquifer. Once in the workings, water freely flows from higher to lower levels and ultimately discharges at the mine portals.

2010 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (31 October –3 November 2010)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 57
Mountain Hydrogeology, Faults, Fractures, Fluid Flow, and Sustainability of Natural Resources: In Memory of the Contributions of Craig Burton Forster
Colorado Convention Center: Room 612
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Sunday, 31 October 2010

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 42, No. 5, p. 149

© Copyright 2010 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.