2010 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (31 October 3 November 2010)
Paper No. 224-6
Presentation Time: 9:15 AM-9:30 AM


ORMAND, Carol J.1, MANDUCA, Cathryn1, MACDONALD, R. Heather2, FEISS, P. Geoffrey3, RICHARDSON, Randall M.4, LEE, Sabra5, and IVERSON, Ellen6, (1) Science Education Resource Center, Carleton College, 1 North College St, Northfield, MN 55057, cormand@carleton.edu, (2) Department of Geology, College of William and Mary, PO Box 8795, Williamsburg, VA 23187, (3) GSAF, 3300 Penrose Place, Boulder, CO 80301, (4) Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Gould-Simpson 208, Building 77, Tucson, AZ 85721-0077, (5) Program Evaluation and Research Group, Lesley University, 29 Everett Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, (6) Science Education Resource Center, Carleton College, 1 North College Street, Northfield, MN 55057

During the 2009-2010 academic year, the Building Strong Geoscience Departments project conducted a program of visiting workshops bringing the results of previous workshops in this program onto geoscience campuses. Seven workshop leaders developed programming for the workshops that highlighted strategies for strengthening a department, examples of successful practice in departments across the country, and on-line resources available through the project website. Programming was developed in five areas of high interest: curriculum and program design, departmental activities beyond the curriculum, recruiting students, preparing students for the workforce, and program assessment. Programming also incorporated information on building departmental consensus and assessing departmental efforts. Information on leaders and programming is at serc.carleton.edu/departments.

3 research universities, 4 comprehensive universities, and 3 four-year colleges were selected from over 25 applications to host workshops. Two leaders worked with each department to define a workshop agenda selecting topics of highest interest from the available programming. Because of the individualized nature of the workshops, each department experienced different benefits. However, most departments found value in: the opportunity to discuss, with external facilitators, the breadth of what they do and how best to do it; completing a SWOT analysis; using an “ideal student” exercise to articulate programmatic learning goals and outcomes; developing a curriculum matrix; and learning how other departments approached similar situations. Many participants cited a shift in their own attitudes toward their curriculum, particularly general education courses; some developed a new feeling of ownership of their curricula. Many noted that seeing examples from other geoscience departments showed them how their department could improve. Resulting actions include: renaming introductory courses and rewriting course descriptions; developing new courses; changing degree program requirements; new student recruitment strategies; promoting programs on campus; soliciting feedback from alumni; and sending news of departmental accomplishments to the provost and dean.

2010 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (31 October 3 November 2010)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 224
Geoscience Education III: Professional Development and Resources
Colorado Convention Center: Room 201
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Wednesday, 3 November 2010

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 42, No. 5, p. 531

© Copyright 2010 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.