STRUCTURAL GEOMETRIES – IMPLICATIONS FOR CO2 STORAGE
- Synclinal spill points developed in structural saddles
- Fault juxtaposition leak points where permeable beds on either side of a fault are connected
- Stratigraphic leak points where permeable beds are connected across seals either by processes of erosion or non-deposition
In many cases the imaging data used to define these leak connections are imprecise or inadequate, so these geometric relations are diagnosed by indirect means like the distribution of different fluid types or pressure data. The inversion of these indirect data types for leak geometries can sometimes be complex, and good 3-D spatial skills are required.
Trap analysis processes are adopted for CO2 storage site selection, but differences in work processes arise to account for fundamental differences in the goal of the analysis. In oil and gas exploration, some level of trap failure is tolerated on an economic basis, but trap leakage to surface for CO2 storage is probably intolerable. Because subsurface data are imperfect for defining leak geometries, this uncertainty must be accounted for in any analysis of CO2 storage site. We propose a method for maximizing the amount of CO2 injected into the Earth while minimizing the risk of CO2 leakage to surface by considering a larger geometric problem that provide redundancy in trap volumes.