calendar Add meeting dates to your calendar.

 

Paper No. 11
Presentation Time: 8:00 AM-6:00 PM

GEOLOGIC AND ANTHROPOGENIC CONTROLS on CARBON DIOXIDE IN EDWARDS AND TRINITY LIMESTONE CAVES, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS


ZAPPITELLO, Sarah J.1, GARY, Marcus O.2 and COWAN, Brian2, (1)Zara Environmental LLC, 1707 W. FM 1626, Manchaca, TX 78652, (2)Zara Environmental, Manchaca, TX 78652, saj@zaraenvironmental.com

Carbon dioxide is globally significant to applications of understanding climate change, determining speleogenetic controls of carbonate aquifer and reservoir diagenesis, and CO2 sequestration of excess greenhouse gasses in the Earth’s atmosphere. Caves provide a unique opportunity to study several aspects of CO2, including: subsurface cycling of CO2 as groundwater interacts with the surrounding limestone matrix, complex temporal patterns related to the dynamic system of CO2 generation in karst settings, and diurnal-seasonal-climatic ventilation patterns related to cave morphology and vadose zone permeability. Two caves at the U.S. Army Camp Bullis Training Site in northern Bexar County, Texas, found within the Edwards and Trinity aquifer systems, have been instrumented with Vaisala CARBOCAP CO2 Probe GMP343 sensors and Campbell Scientific CR1000 dataloggers to continuously record CO2 concentrations every 15 minutes. This high-frequency, temporal record of CO2 levels in the two caves has been monitored for approximately two years. CO2 levels at each cave demonstrate distinct seasonal trends; however, the two caves display reverse seasonal trends relative to each other, despite being only 3 km apart and both in the Kainer Formation. Cave A follows the trend observed by many researchers of higher summer CO2 concentrations (avg 4,747 ppm) and lower winter concentrations (avg 500 ppm). Cave B displays higher concentrations of CO2 in the winter (avg 12,830 ppm) and lower concentrations during the summer (avg 1,185 ppm). These reverse trends may be due to different background levels of moisture in the caves or to cave morphology and deeper sources of CO2. Cave A has collapse morphology and maintains moisture year-round. Cave B has shallow maze morphology and dries completely seasonally. Understanding the processes controlling cave CO2 fluctuations has wide applications in karst hydrogeology, speleothem paleoclimate reconstruction, and cave ecology.
Meeting Home page GSA Home Page