|Northeastern Section (45th Annual) and Southeastern Section (59th Annual) Joint Meeting (13-16 March 2010)|
|Paper No. 57-7|
|Presentation Time: 1:30 PM-5:35 PM|
BASELINE ASSESSMENT OF STREAM HEALTH AFTER RESTORATION, VALLEY CREEK WATERSHED, PA
FINLAY, Alyssa J.1, TORAN, Laura1, FANG, Allison1, MEAD, Jerry V.2, and JACKSON, John K.3, (1) Earth and Environmental Science, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, firstname.lastname@example.org, (2) Patrick Center for Environmental Research, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA 19103, (3) Stroud Water Research Center, Avondale, PA 19311|
Urbanization tends to reduce the number and diversity of aquatic species in watersheds. The effect of stream restoration on the ecosystem is less well understood. This issue was examined at Crabby Creek, a stream located in Valley Creek watershed in southeastern PA. In the summer of 2008, a portion of the stream was moved and reconstructed because it was corroding a sewage line. Restoration structures were constructed along the stream to create stability and reduce erosion along the banks. The structures included J-Hooks, cross vanes and cross logs and also helped to create riffle, run and pool stream environments.
Certain species of aquatic macroinvertebrates are more tolerant of pollution than others. Based upon tolerance levels, as well as the variety and quantity of taxon, macroinvertebrates can be used to determine the health of a stream’s ecosystem and its water quality. In spring 2009, samples were collected using a Surber sampler from nine randomly chosen sites, including riffle, run and pool habitats. The Surber sampled a 1 ft square area. Samples were picked using a dissecting scope then sorted and identified to genus when possible. These data were compared with macroinvertebrate counts before reconstruction.
To date, the samples have shown little diversity and low abundance of species. Only 4-6 taxon per site were observed in spring 2009 compared to 15 in the pre-restoration count. Total counts were low, on the order of 100 individuals per site, where typical prerestoration numbers are closer to 1000 per site. The macroinvertebrates observed were also very small in size compared to average macroinvertebrates. The low counts may be the result of the dynamic nature of the new streambed which has undergone a lot of sediment redistribution. This study provided a baseline macroinvertebrate assessment, which can be compared to future studies to determine the rate of restoration of the stream’s ecosystem health.
Northeastern Section (45th Annual) and Southeastern Section (59th Annual) Joint Meeting (13-16 March 2010)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 57|
Hydrogeology of Wetlands and Watershed Processes (Posters)
Sheraton Baltimore City Center: International ABCDF
1:30 PM-5:35 PM, Monday, 15 March 2010
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 42, No. 1, p. 144
© Copyright 2010 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.