DOUBLE-SIDED WEDGE MODEL FOR RETREATING SUBDUCTION ZONES: APPLICATIONS TO THE APENNINIC AND HELLENIC SUBDUCTION ZONES
The Hellenic and Apenninic wedges are both associated with retreating subduction zones. The Hellenic wedge has been active for about 100 Ma, whereas the Apenninic wedge has been active for about 30 Ma. Comparison of maximum metamorphic pressures for exhumed rocks in these wedges (25 and 30 km, respectively) with the maximum thickness of the wedges at present (30 and 35 km, respectively) indicates that each wedge has maintained a relatively steady size during its evolution. This conclusion is based on the constraint that both frictional and viscous wedges are subject to the constraint of a steady wedge taper, so that thickness and width are strongly correlated. Both wedges show clear evidence of steady accretion during their full evolution, with accretionary fluxes of about 60 and 200 km2 Ma-1. These wedges also both show steady drift of material from the front to the rear of the wedge, with horizontal shortening dominating in the front of the wedge, and horizontal extension within the back of the wedge.
We propose that these wedges represent two back-to-back wedges, with a convergent wedge on the leading side (proside), and a divergent wedge on the trailing side (retroside). In this sense, the wedges are bound by two plates. The subducting plate is familiar. It creates a thrust-sense traction beneath the proside of the wedge. The second plate is an “educting” plate, which is creates a normal-sense traction beneath the retroside of the wedge. The educting plate underlies the Tyrrenhian Sea west of the Apennines and the Cretean Sea north of Crete. The stretched crust that overlies this plate represents highly thinned wedge material that has been removed or decreted from the wedge. This decretion process accounts for the mean motion within the wedge, from pro to retro side, and the pervasive thinning within the retroside. It also explains how these wedges are able to maintain a steady wedge size with time. An important prediction of this model is that different deformational styles, involving thickening and thinning, can occur within the same tectonics setting. This is in contrast the widely cited idea that tectonic thinning is a late- or post-orogenic process.