|2011 GSA Annual Meeting in Minneapolis (9–12 October 2011)|
|Paper No. 152-10|
|Presentation Time: 10:30 AM-10:45 AM|
GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR INVESTIGATION OF GOPHER-TORTOISE BURROWS: REFINING THE CHARACTERIZATION OF MODERN VERTEBRATE BURROWS AND ASSOCIATED COMMENSAL TRACES
MARTIN, Anthony J., Department of Environmental Studies, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, firstname.lastname@example.org, SKAGGS, Sheldon A., Department of Geology and Geography, Georgia Southern Universiity, Statesboro, GA 30458, VANCE, R. Kelly, Department of Geology and Geography, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30460, and GRECO, Veronica, Wildlife Department, St. Catherines Island Foundation, 182 Camellia Rd, Midway, GA 31320-6731|
Large-sized vertebrate burrows are challenging structures for neoichnologists to assess, often defying accurate description unless excavated or otherwise disturbed in ways that degrade their incipient qualities. Moreover, such invasive procedures may erase other valuable information, such as the presence, locations, and forms of burrows made by commensal animals living in these structures. To avoid these potential problems, we propose the use of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) for imaging large vertebrate burrows. In our study, we profiled modern, active and inactive burrows of adult and juvenile gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) on Saint Catherines Island, Georgia. The GPR unit used for this procedure was a MALA system with cart-mounted 500 MHz and 800 MHz shielded antennae. In practice, the burrows produced GPR reflection hyperbolae similar to those of utility pipes and roots. Primary burrow trends were established quickly by starting at the burrow mouth and using a loose zig-zag profile pattern to identify the burrow, then flagging it on the surface. Profile grids were established and conducted to ensure the burrow system was fully represented, thus providing a detailed database. GPR-Slice™ software was used to create two-dimensional and three-dimensional images of the burrow structures without disturbance to any animals occupying the burrows, likewise avoiding our inadvertently adding to taphonomic processes affecting burrows. Our methods resulted in resolving the overall geometry of gopher-tortoise burrows. Single and multiple intersecting burrows of various sizes, presumably made by commensal animals or juvenile gopher tortoises, were also definable from the GPR data. To further test our technique, we are building a burrow model with PVC piping to establish radar response to profile and burrow orientation. Additionally, a time series of GPR surveys could show how burrow structures may change over time with taphonomic processes and evolve into forms that would more realistically mimic analogous trace fossils.
2011 GSA Annual Meeting in Minneapolis (9–12 October 2011)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 152|
Lessons from the Living: Paleontological Investigations Using Modern Analogs I
Minneapolis Convention Center: Room 205AB
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Tuesday, 11 October 2011
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 43, No. 5, p. 381
© Copyright 2011 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.