|2011 GSA Annual Meeting in Minneapolis (9–12 October 2011)|
|Paper No. 208-1|
|Presentation Time: 1:30 PM-1:45 PM|
WERE PROTISTS THE BEGINNING OF THE END FOR STROMATOLITES?
BERNHARD, Joan M.1, EDGCOMB, Virginia P.1, SUMMONS, Roger E.2, VISSCHER, Pieter T.3, and MCINTYRE-WRESSNIG, Anna1, (1) Department of Geology & Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, firstname.lastname@example.org, (2) Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT, E25-633, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, (3) Center for Integrative Geosciences, University of Connecticut, 354 Mansfield Rd U-2045, Storrs, CT 06269|
The oldest fossil stromatolites are >3.4 billion years old and are the most visible manifestations of pervasive microbial life on the early Earth. The changes in stromatolite abundance and morphology over time document complex interplays between biological and geological processes. We focus on one of the greatest geological enigmas: the possible connection between stromatolite decline and the rise of complex life. While much is known about microbialite autotrophs, little is known about their heterotrophic eukaryotes. Details of stromatolite formation and preservation are poorly understood, and a drastic decline in stromatolite occurrence and diversity in the late Precambrian has long been a conundrum. A popular hypothesis to explain this decline at ~1 billion years ago is that eukaryotic organisms evolved to become predators on stromatolites. To date, the most commonly proposed predatory culprit is an unidentified metazoan, although evidence of such an organism is lacking from the fossil record. Protists, most of which are not expected to leave an obvious fossil record, are additional possible stromatolitic predators, but they have been largely ignored in this context. We have been testing the hypotheses that (1) Heterotrophic protist activity caused the textural change from stromatolites (layered sediment fabric) to thrombolites (clotted sediment fabric) and (2) Heterotrophic protists caused the decimation of Neoproterozoic stromatolites. It is impossible to recreate the Neoproterozoic, so experimental, ecological, microscopic, molecular, and chemical studies of modern analogs must serve to indirectly test our hypotheses. Highlighted in this talk will be our initial results on Highborne Cay (Bahamas) and Hamelin Pool (Australia) microbialites. For example, Laser Scanning Confocal Micrographs of Fluorescently Labeled Embedded Cores (FLEC, Bernhard et al. 2003 L&O) will show life positions of eukaryotes in different microbialites from both sites. Comparative CAT scans of the same cores will show sediment fabrics. Also presented will be initial results, using the same methods, from an experiment where allogromiid foraminifera were seeded onto unlithified smooth stromatolites to determine the effect of their pseudopodial activities on stromatolite fabric. Supported by NSF OCE-0926421.
2011 GSA Annual Meeting in Minneapolis (9–12 October 2011)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 208|
Lessons from the Living: Paleontological Investigations Using Modern Analogs II
Minneapolis Convention Center: Room 205AB
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Tuesday, 11 October 2011
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 43, No. 5, p. 503
© Copyright 2011 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.