|2011 GSA Annual Meeting in Minneapolis (9–12 October 2011)|
|Paper No. 99-3|
|Presentation Time: 9:00 AM-6:00 PM|
ESTIMATING THE NUMBER OF PULSES IN A MASS EXTINCTION
ZHONG, Ling and WANG, Steve C., Mathematics and Statistics, Swarthmore College, 500 College Ave, Swarthmore, PA 19081, firstname.lastname@example.org|
Most previous work on the Signor-Lipps effect has focused on testing whether taxa in a mass extinction went extinct simultaneously as opposed to gradually. Many authors, however, have proposed scenarios in which taxa go extinct in distinct pulses or stages. Little methodology has been developed for quantifying characteristics of such pulsed extinction events. Here we introduce a method for estimating the number of pulses in a mass extinction, based on the positions of fossil occurrences in a stratigraphic section. Rather than using a hypothesis test, which assumes simultaneous extinction as a default, we reframe the question by asking what number of pulses best explains the observed fossil record.
For each possible number of pulses (from 1 to the total number of taxa) we calculate the likelihood for each possible extinction scenario with that number of pulses. From this we are able to determine the scenario having the maximum likelihood for each number of pulses. We then use Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), which quantifies the fit of a model to the data while accounting for the model’s complexity, to compare these likelihoods and find the optimal number of pulses.
Our framework has several advantages compared to classical hypothesis testing. First, we are able to determine relative weights for each number of pulses, rather than just a binary reject/do not reject decision. Second, in a hypothesis testing framework, the null hypothesis is privileged in the sense that it is the default, and is not rejected unless it is disproved beyond a reasonable doubt. While this asymmetry may be beneficial in some situations (e.g., a clinical trial for testing a new drug), it is not clear in our situation that simultaneous extinction should be favored as the null hypothesis. Third, a hypothesis test asks whether the observed data are consistent with the null hypothesis. However, even if the data are consistent with the null hypothesis (i.e., simultaneous extinction), they may be more consistent with other hypotheses (i.e., pulsed extinction).
We demonstrate the method by applying it to datasets from the end-Cretaceous and end-Permian extinctions.
2011 GSA Annual Meeting in Minneapolis (9–12 October 2011)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 99--Booth# 91|
Paleontology (Posters) II: Extinction and Environment
Minneapolis Convention Center: Hall C
9:00 AM-6:00 PM, Monday, 10 October 2011
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 43, No. 5, p. 259
© Copyright 2011 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.