CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 13
Presentation Time: 9:00 AM-6:00 PM

REGIONAL LOWER JURASSIC UNCONFORMITY ON THE SOUTHERN COLORADO PLATEAU, USA


LUCAS, Spencer G., New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, 1801 Mountain Road N.W, Albuquerque, NM 87104 and TANNER, Lawrence H., Dept. Biological Sciences, Le Moyne College, 1419 Salt Springs Rd, Syracuse, NY 13214, spencer.lucas@state.nm.us

On the southern Colorado Plateau of Utah-Colorado-Arizona, the significant change in depositional systems, from the eolian erg of the Upper Triassic-Lower Jurassic Wingate Sandstone, to the fluvial braidplain of the overlying Kayenta Formation, is marked by a regional unconformity. However, diverse published sources have described the Wingate-Kayenta contact as interfingering and/or gradational. We examined this contact over southern Utah, SW Colorado and NE Arizona, an area of at least 100,000 km2, to conclude that it is a regional surface of unconformity between: (1) Wingate strata that are very fine- to fine-grained, well sorted, quartzose and (mostly) crossbedded eolian sandstone that weathers to a “slick rock” cliff; and (2) Kayenta strata that are fine- to medium-grained subarkosic arenite (in many beds micaceous), lenticular to tabular, cross bedded fluvial sandstone with some beds of intrabasinal conglomerate and thin interbeds and lenses of red-bed mudrock. The Wingate-Kayenta contact is typically marked by an incised surface characterized at the base of the Kayenta Fm (base of Springdale Member) by intrabasinal conglomerate. This conglomerate includes rip-up clasts of sandstone from the underlying Wingate Sandstone. In some areas of SE Utah and SW Colorado, no conglomerate is present, although the contact is still a sharp surface between the contrasting sandstones of the two formations. At some outcrops (example: Lisbon Valley), we can document meters of stratigraphic relief over 100 m of strike at the sandstone-sandstone contact between the Wingate and Kayenta fms. Therefore, we reject claims of a conformable contact and support the conclusion of those workers who have identified the Wingate-Kayenta contact as a regional unconformity. The duration of the hiatus represented by this unconformity can be calibrated to be much of Hettangian time (~ 3 my), as the Wingate is no younger than earliest Hettangian (based on its stratigraphic relationship to the Moenave Fm) and biostratigraphy demonstrates an early Sinemurian age for the lower Kayenta Fm.
Meeting Home page GSA Home Page