JOHN LESLIE ON THE PALEOCLIMATIC SIGNIFICANCE OF SWISS MORAINES IN 1796
Leslie supported his concept of global warming with geological evidence. In company with pioneer photographer Thomas Wedgwood, he had gone to the continent in 1796 and taken a coach over Grimsel Pass in the Swiss Alps, from the headwaters of the Rhône to those of the Aar. Leslie recognized that the innumerable ridges of loose angular stones, vegetated in proportion to their distance from active glaciers, mark the former extents of those glaciers at a colder time. He noted that “this remarkable fact is known to every tourist”. He concluded that the “line of perpetual congelation must have descended at least 2000 feet lower than its present station. At that remote period, the lake which now feeds the Aar was probably a glacier.”
It would be decades before the same conclusions were reached by Venetz (1822), Charpentier (1835) and Agassiz (1837). It is true that Hutton (1795) and Playfair (1802) had earlier ascribed the granite erratics on the Jura to glacial action, but neither had ever seen a glacier and their attention was fixed on timeless processes of erosion. Both attributed the former extent of Swiss glaciers to a greater elevation of the Alps (as did Charpentier), not to climatic change. Leslie had the advantage over later geologists that he was not encumbered with the (false) assumption, subsequent to Fourier (1824), that Earth’s surface temperature is steadily in decline, due to secular dimming of the sun. Leslie’s prescient intepretation of Swiss moraines was previously noted by de Beer (1932) and Cunningham (1990).