CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 1
Presentation Time: 9:00 AM

MODELING AND MAPPING THE AREA OF POTENTIAL IMPACT ASSOCIATED WITH CO2 INJECTION WELLS


KRAEMER, Stephen R., US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 960 College Station Road, Athens, GA 30605-2700, kraemer.stephen@epa.gov

The EPA Underground Injection Program (UIC) geological carbon sequestration rule requires applicants to model and map an area of review (AoR) about the CO2 injection well(s). The AoR focuses the geological and geographical survey for compromises to the sealing layers, such as from fractures or abandoned wells, which might provide migration pathways for CO2 or displaced native brines and threaten the quality of Underground Sources of Drinking Water (USDWs). Therefore, the mapping of the AoR may be based on the projection of subsurface zones of potential and endangering influence. Given that supercritical phase CO2 is less dense than the saline fluids in the receiving zone, it is important for the sealing layer(s) to physically contain the buoyant CO2, especially during the lifetime of the injection. The sealing layer is also expected to contain the saline fluids displaced by the injection of CO2. It is not pressure influence that contributes to endangerment, but the critical threshold pressure that could support upward flow of saline fluids from the injection zone to the USDW through a hypothetical unplugged well. Permit applicants are required to use computational (meaning numerical) models to map the maximum extent of separate phase CO2 and the threshold pressure front. This research project is evaluating simpler area of potential impact (AoPI) tools for regulators to evaluate the complex numerical models associated with the permit applications. The AoPI tools are based on semi-analytic solutions for modeling and mapping the zone of pressure influence, the threshold pressure front, and the CO2 front. The AoPI tools support conceptual model testing, and their computational efficiency allows for probabilistic uncertainty analysis. Comparisons to the TOUGH2 numerical model support the testing and verification of definitions of critical pressure. Products from the research will be web and desktop-based GIS tools for the modeling and mapping the AoPI based on the projection of the outer envelope containing maximum extent threshold pressure and CO2 fronts. The research and development team includes support from Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Princeton University, S.S. Papadopulos and Associates, and RTI International.
Handouts
  • Stephen Kraemer October 2011 GSA poster.pdf (3.1 MB)
  • Meeting Home page GSA Home Page