CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 6
Presentation Time: 10:15 AM

APPLICATION AND EVALUATION OF DEVELOPED REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES TO IDENTIFY AND TRACK CHANGES OF SUBZONES WITHIN A SALT MARSH NEAR WALLOPS ISLAND, VA


CULP, Brian M., Geography and Geosciences, Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, 310 E. Market St, Danville, PA 17821, VENN, Cynthia, Department of Environmental, Geographical, and Geological Sciences, Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, 400 E 2nd Street, Bloomsburg, PA 17815, BRUNSKILL, Jeffrey C., Geography and Geosciences, Bloomsburg Univ of Pennsylvania, 400 East Second Street, Bloomsburg, PA 17815 and SHEPARD, Michael K., Department of Environmental, Geographical and Geological Sciences, Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, 400 E. 2nd St, Bloomsburg, PA 17815, bmc30829@huskies.bloomu.edu

In previous work, we developed a method to differentiate subzones within a coastal marsh using false color high resolution satellite imagery and the ArcGIS spatial analysis package. We found a good correlation between pansharpened images (resolutions at or greater than 0.6 meters/pixel) and subzones mapped in previous field work. This method was found to be relatively simple and cost effective. Here we report on the results of a blind test in which we will repeat the process on a new satellite data set prior to ground mapping to determine its accuracy and reliability. Two areas will be mapped on the ground in the summer and processed into ArcGIS. Separately, high resolution imagery of a larger scene that encompasses both map sites will be processed using the previously developed method. The two independent methods of mapping will then be compared and differences between the two methods quantified. The more recent imagery will also be compared to previous ground truthing to see whether changes have taken place. If this method proves viable, it could be a simple and useful tool for coastal and wildlife managers to monitor small changes in relative sea level or land availability (due to erosion or other factors) on a regular basis.
Meeting Home page GSA Home Page