CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 4
Presentation Time: 2:30 PM

MONITORING AND MODELING LONG-TERM CHANGES OF RAINFALL-RUNOFF RESPONSE AND WATER QUALITY IN A SMALL AGRICULTURAL WATERSHED RESTORED TO PRAIRIE


GERLA, Phil1, DINGER, Matthew2, MCCOY, Ernie1, OVERMOE-KENNINGER, Kate3 and ROEHRDANZ, Nicholas2, (1)Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, University of North Dakota, 81 Cornell Street Stop 8358, Grand Forks, ND 58202, (2)Department of Geography, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, (3)Earth System Science and Policy, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, phil.gerla@engr.und.edu

Although agricultural development generally leads to a step alteration in rainfall-runoff response and water quality, subsequent changes in land use create dynamic hydrological conditions. Furthermore, will restoration to pre-development land cover in a small watershed lead to full recovery of original hydrology? We analyzed 110 yr of land-use change for Judicial Ditch 66, which drains 3800 ha of recently restored prairie in NW Minnesota. The well-instrumented site lies on the margin of glacial Lake Agassiz, where strandlines parallel bands of wetland and prairie in the basin and comprise a component of the central North American flyway. Dominant land use can be divided into 4 phases: 1. nonintegrated drainage, groundwater and runoff lost to wetlands; 2. drainage and grazing; 3. cultivation, aggregate mining and drainage, and feedlot operation; 4. prairie reconstruction and closure of ditches. Curve number and Muskingum method routing were applied to estimate storm hydrographs. A USGS gage established in 2002 provides data for model calibration, enabling hydrological back- and forecasting. No runoff occurred during the pre-development stage, with an abrupt start and progressively increasing watershed runoff and flashiness through phases 2 and 3. For a 5 yr storm, model comparison to regional statistical methods suggests that 50% of the watershed was non-contributing during maximum phase 3 ditching and cultivation, increasing to 72% with diminishing stream flow following restoration. Active gravel leases and continued drainage of remaining agricultural land in the basin prevent a full recovery of the original conditions. Carbonate-rich soil and till substrate mitigated phosphorus "flush" following wetland restoration. A large store of P, however, remains near the feedlot. Although concentrations of NO3 as high as 55 mg/L occurred in surficial aquifers, elevated concentrations of labile organic C in discharge zones and ditches greatly diminish NO3 transport.
Meeting Home page GSA Home Page