CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 9
Presentation Time: 4:00 PM

STORM-EVENT RESPONSES OF FIVE KARST SPRINGS IN THE KAWEAH RIVER BASIN, SIERRA NEVADA, CALIFORNIA


TOBIN, Benjamin W., Department of Biology, Texas State University - San Marcos, 601 University Dr, San Marcos, TX 78666 and SCHWARTZ, Benjamin F., Edwards Aquifer Research and Data Center, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666, bt1171@txstate.edu

In mid-December, 2010, the Kaweah River basin experienced a record precipitation event. The associated flood pulse produced varying responses at five karst springs, which span an elevational gradient from 500 m to 2600 m. Each of the springs (Tufa Spring, Big Spring, Crystal Cave Spring, Mossy Spring, and Alder Spring) were instrumented with dataloggers recording temperature, specific conductance, and water level.

All springs exhibited a distinct pulse of water moving through the system after the storm. However, temperature and specific conductance responses varied between springs. These differences are likely due to differences in both the dominant flow path and recharge component (diffuse vs. direct), as well as differences in geologic controls on the diffuse recharge component. Hydrograph separation and other methods were used to estimate relative contributions of event and pre-event waters discharging from springs, as well as to investigate the longer term responses of each spring as the relative contribution of each component changes over time.

Three response patterns were seen at the springs. Three springs had large and rapid contributions of event water to spring discharge: Big, Mossy, and Alder Springs. Each of these exhibited clear responses in stage, temperature, and specific conductance, indicating direct recharge and flow through conduits. In these springs, this storm pulse moved relatively quickly through the system, and temperature and specific conductance increased towards their initial values following the event. Tufa Springs showed a similar initial large decrease in temperature and specific conductance, but with a continued decrease in conductivity after the initial spike, which we interpreted to indicate a large direct recharge component followed by increasing dilution from relatively rapid diffuse infiltration through overlying glacial sediments. Crystal Cave Spring had a much smaller contribution of event water to its discharge and appears to have a strong input control on recharge at the stream-bed sinkpoint. These results document a range of karst systems within the basin that exhibit a diversity of controls on spring discharge and geochemistry in a mountain groundwater system.

Meeting Home page GSA Home Page