THE INAP PIT LAKES DATABASE – A TOOL FOR PREDICTING FUTURE PIT LAKE WATER QUALITY
The pH vs. concentration plots show two general water quality patterns: exponential trends and clusters. Al, Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb, SO4, Zn, Mg, and Ba show concentrations that exponentially decrease as pH increases, whereas Ag, As, Co, Cr, Hg, Mn, Mo, Ni, Sb, V, Cl, CHO3, K, Mg, Na, B, Be, F, Si, Sn, Sr, and NO3 tend to cluster within a narrow pH range. In general, ion concentrations span only one to two orders of magnitude. However, some ions like Sb and V span several orders of magnitude.
The following characteristics can be identified based on ore body types. Pit lakes in Massive Sulfide ore deposits tend to be clustered in the low pH range (2-3.5) and have higher ion concentrations than other ore types. For example, Fe ranges from 50 to 5000 mg/L between pH 1.2 and 3.2. Pit lakes in Taconite ore deposits tend to cluster in the high pH (6-9.5) range and show less variation in ion concentrations. Fe ranges from 0.05 to 0.5 mg/L over a pH range of 6.4 to 9.4 in this deposit. Pit lakes in Carlin-Type Gold deposits tend to cluster between pH 7 and 9, show wider variability in ion concentrations, and exhibit ion concentrations that decrease exponentially with pH. For example, Fe ranges from 0.001 to 100 mg/L over a pH range of 3 to 9.4. The utility of the database will increase as more data are added in the future.