CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 9
Presentation Time: 10:15 AM

DOES ECOLOGICAL CHANGE SCALE WITH PERCENT EXTINCTION? QUANTIFYING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TAXONOMIC LOSS AND FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY


CHRISTIE, Max, Geology, Pennsylvania State University, 434 Deike Building, University Park, PA 16802, HOLLAND, Steven M., Department of Geology, Univ of Georgia, Geology Building, Athens, GA 30602 and BUSH, Andrew M., Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Center for Integrative Geosciences, University of Connecticut, 75 N. Eagleville Road, Unit 3043, Storrs, CT 06269, mchristie09@gmail.com

The ecological impacts of extinction are often measured in terms of the taxa lost; however, previous work has shown that patterns of taxonomic loss may differ from the loss of functional units in an ecosystem. Functional diversity is an important part of ecosystem stability, and should also be considered in order to understand the effects of extinction on ecological change.

Using data sets from the Eastern U.S., we quantify the relationship between taxonomic and ecological change across three extinction events of increasing genus extinction intensity: the early Late Ordovician M4/M5 extinction, the Mid-Late Devonian mass extinctions (Givetian/Frasnian and Frasnian/Famennian boundaries), and the end-Ordovician mass extinction. Taxonomic and ecological changes during each extinction were contrasted by classifying organisms into genera and guilds, followed by analysis with additive diversity partitioning, ordination, and relative abundance distributions.

In terms of additive diversity partitioning, taxonomic extinction is similar for both the Ordovician/Silurian and Mid-Late Devonian extinction events, but the Devonian shows much greater effects in terms of guilds. When controlling for the effects of extinction alone (i.e., excluding origination/immigration), guild diversity remains high after the Ordovician/Silurian event, but decreases drastically after the Devonian extinctions. The M4/M5 shows minor extinction for both genera and guilds. In terms of ordination, the greatest taxonomic separation was observed across the Ordovician/Silurian boundary while the greatest ecological separation was observed across the Devonian extinctions. In terms of relative abundance distribution analyses, the total change in relative abundance was similar for the Ordovician/Silurian and Devonian extinctions in terms of genera and guilds. Taken together, this suggests that while many taxa go extinct across the Ordovician/Silurian boundary, post-extinction taxa fill the same ecological roles as pre-extinction taxa. In contrast, post-extinction taxa in the Late Devonian only inhabited a fraction of the ecological roles as pre-extinction taxa. These results underscore that the magnitude of taxonomic change during an extinction can be a poor predictor of the amount of ecological change.

Meeting Home page GSA Home Page