CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 5
Presentation Time: 2:40 PM

MONAZITE AS A MONITOR OF MELTING IN CONTINENTAL CRUST


GONCALVES, Philippe1, TRAP, Pierre1, DUMOND, Gregory2, MARQUER, Didier1, FEYBESSE, Jean-Louis3 and PAQUETTE, Jean-Louis4, (1)UMR Chrono-environnement, Université de Franche-Comté, 16 route de Gray, Besançon, 25030, France, (2)Geosciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, (3)Geosciences Department - Geoscience Technologies, AREVA, Tour AREVA - 0519A, 1, Place Jean Millier, Paris La Défende, 92084, France, (4)Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans, Université Blaise Pascal, 5 rue Kessler, Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France, philippe.goncalves@univ-fcomte.fr

Monazite is sensitive to fluid- and melt-rock interactions, and thus may be used to monitor the spatially- and temporally-variable impact of melting in continental crust. Understanding the behavior of monazite in partially molten systems is essential for interpreting dates from complexly-zoned grains, constraining the P-T-t-D evolution of HT-terranes, understanding the mechanisms of U and Th mobility and the formation of ore deposits. Monazite + melt relationships have been studied in two well-exposed middle to lower crustal orogens in the Canadian Shield: the CAGE district (Torngat Orogen) and the Upper Deck domain (Athabasca granulite terrane).

Melting in the CAGE district was associated with kilometer-scale S-C-C’ structure development. Melt and late fluids were preferentially transferred into sub-vertical C- and C’-type shear zones. Garnet-bearing migmatites in the S-structures contain abundant, large monazite with complex zoning. Circa 1.85-1.83 Ga dates are interpreted as the age of partial melting. Identification of layer-specific textures, dates and zoning in monazite suggests that the volume of rock interacting with monazite during growth and dissolution is less than the cm3-scale. In the C structures, Grt-Sil-Crd paragneiss is interpreted as restitite related to melt loss during decompression with rare small euhedral and homogeneous monazite grains that yield a consistent date of 1.81 Ga. Thermodynamic modeling of monazite-melt solubility suggests that monazite dissolution was nearly complete during the decompression and melt loss associated with C structure development.

Fluid-absent biotite melting in the Upper Deck domain was associated with sub-horizontal fabric development in the lower crust (>925C, >1.3 GPa). Pre-melting monazite domains (>2.61 Ga) are typically resorbed, Y-rich cores. Syn-melting domains are Y-depleted due to growth in the presence of peritectic garnet and Th-rich due to crystallization of monazite from anatectic melt at 2.61-2.55 Ga. Low-Th overgrowths with positive Eu-anomalies at ca. 2.54 Ga occurred during melt loss and crustal thickening, concurrent with growth of HP-Grt at the expense of plagioclase.

Our research emphasizes the important role of monazite in monitoring the effects of partial melting, melt loss, and melt crystallization during orogeny.

Meeting Home page GSA Home Page