CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 1
Presentation Time: 1:30 PM

THE VALUE OF FIELD OCCURRENCE STUDIES OF FECAL CONTAMINATION IN AQUIFERS AND WELLS


MCKAY, Larry1, LAYTON, Alice C.2, KNAPPETT, Peter S.K.3, CULLIGAN, Patricia J.4, MAILLOUX, Brian J.5, FERGUSON, Andrew4, FEIGHERY, John4, EMCH, Michael6, SERRE, Marc L.7 and VAN GEEN, Alex8, (1)Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The University of Tennessee, 1412 Circle Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996-1410, (2)Center for Environmental Biotechnology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, (3)Institute for Groundwater Ecology, Helmholtz Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, Neuherberg, 85764, Germany, (4)Civil Engineering & Engineering Mechanics, Columbia University, Room 626, 500 W. 120th Street, New York, NY 10027, (5)Department of Environmental Sciences, Barnard College, 76 Claremont Ave, New York, NY 10027, (6)Department of Geography, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Saunders 308, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, (7)Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3220, (8)Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, 205 Core Lab, 61 Route 9W, PO Box 1000, Palisades, NY 10964-8000, lmckay@utk.edu

Field-scale investigations of the occurrence of fecal contamination in aquifers and wells play an important role in developing a better understanding of the potential health impacts of exposure to contaminated groundwater. These kinds of studies are often challenging, time consuming and expensive, partly because of spatial and temporal variability in many of the factors (societal and physical) that influence occurrence of microbial contaminants. As a result, it is often difficult to obtain funding for such studies, especially over the multi-year time periods necessary to evaluate the influence of seasonal factors, such as precipitation, or to relate contaminant occurrence to disease. Journal editors are sometimes hesitant to publish these kinds of manuscripts, especially studies at the village or local scale, out of concern that the results may not have broad applicability to other areas. The authors respectfully submit that such studies are essential, because they help distinguish what “is” occurring from what might be “predicted” to occur. In some respects, they are like medical “case histories”, which can provide important new insights, especially when studies from multiple patients (field sites) are compared. These observations can then be used to inform newly designed laboratory or modeling experiments, which together with the field studies form a valuable type of meta-analysis. Field occurrence studies can also identify unexpected transport mechanisms, pathways or sources of microbial contamination, which may lead to changes in water resource management or health policy. The authors recently completed a 3-year study of fecal contamination in a series of rural villages in Bangladesh. The study was hypothesis-driven (related to geologic controls on occurrence of arsenic and fecal bacteria), but some of the most exciting findings were not a central part of the original experimental design. A few of these are briefly discussed and include: a) the role of village ponds as sources of fecal contamination, b) the influence of pumping duration on concentration of fecal bacteria, and c) cast-iron hand pumps as reservoirs of fecal bacteria. These findings and subsequent publications, which support (or do not support) conventional wisdom, point out the importance of field occurrence studies.
Handouts
  • McKay_GSA_Session_279-1.pdf (933.0 kB)
  • Meeting Home page GSA Home Page