CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 10
Presentation Time: 10:15 AM

MEPAG RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A 2018 MARS SAMPLE RETURN CACHING LANDER – SAMPLE TYPES, NUMBER, AND SIZES


ALLEN, Carlton C., NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058, SEPHTON, Mark, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom, MCLENNAN, Scott M., Geosciences, Stony Brook Research Foundation, Stony Brook, NY 11794, BEATY, David W., Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA 91109-8001, BOSTON, Penny, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801, GRADY, Monica, Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom, HEBER, Veronika, Univ. of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, HERD, Christopher D. K., Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, RUFF, Steven W., Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-6305 and SYMES, Steve, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, carlton.c.allen@nasa.gov

The return to Earth of geological & atmospheric samples from the surface of Mars is among the highest priority objectives of planetary science. The MEPAG Mars Sample Return (MSR) End-to-End International Science Analysis Group (MEPAG E2E-iSAG) was chartered to propose scientific objectives & priorities for returned sample science, & to map out the implications of these priorities, including for the proposed joint ESA-NASA 2018 mission that would be tasked with the crucial job of collecting & caching the samples.

The E2E-iSAG identified four overarching scientific aims that relate to understanding: A) the potential for life & its pre-biotic context, B) the geologic processes that have affected the martian surface, C) planetary evolution of Mars & its atmosphere, D) potential for future human exploration.

The types of samples deemed most likely to achieve the science objectives are, in priority order:

1A. Subaqueous or hydrothermal sediments

1B. Hydrothermally altered rocks or low temperature fluid-altered rocks (equal priority)

2. Unaltered igneous rocks

3. Regolith, including airfall dust

4. Present-day atmosphere & samples of sedimentary-igneous rocks containing ancient trapped atmosphere

Collection of geologically well-characterized sample suites would add considerable value to interpretations of all collected rocks. To achieve this, the total number of rock samples should be about 30-40.

In order to evaluate the size of individual samples required to meet the science objectives, the E2E-iSAG reviewed the analytical methods that would likely be applied to the returned samples by preliminary examination teams, for planetary protection (i.e., life detection, biohazard assessment) and, after distribution, by individual investigators. It was concluded that sample size should be sufficient to perform all high-priority analyses in triplicate. In keeping with long-established curatorial practice of extraterrestrial material, at least 40% by mass of each sample should be preserved to support future scientific investigations. Samples of 15-16 grams are considered optimal. The total mass of returned rocks, soils, blanks & standards should be approximately 500 grams. Atmospheric gas samples should be the equivalent of 50 cm3 at 20 times Mars ambient atmospheric pressure.

Coauthors: The MEPAG E2E-iSAG Team

Meeting Home page GSA Home Page