Paper No. 14
Presentation Time: 5:00 PM
COMPARISON OF THE AGGREGATION BEHAVIOR OF TiO2 NANOPARTICLES EXPOSED TO FULVIC ACID AND BACILLUS SUBTILIS EXUDATES
The aggregation behavior of engineered TiO2 nanoparticles depends on solution pH, ionic strength (IS) and dissolved organic matter (DOM) concentration. Most studies of the effects of DOM on the aggregation of nano-TiO2 have used pedogenic humic and fulvic acids in relatively high DOM-to-particle ratios, and in general, suggest a tendency for less aggregation in the presence of DOM. However, the aggregation behavior of nano-TiO2 suspensions is likely to differ significantly when exposed to lower DOM-to-particle ratios and/or DOM of aquagenic origin, such as microbial exudates. Hence, we compared the effects of varying concentrations (0.1 mg DOC L-1 to 10 mg DOC L-1) of Suwannee River fulvic acid (SRFA) and Bacillus subtilis exudate on the aggregation behavior of 50 mg L-1 nano-TiO2 suspensions in high (0.1M) and low (0.01M) ionic strengths at pH 3 to 7.5. We measured sedimentation rates using sequential UV-Vis spectrophotometry over 240 minutes, and compared the measured rates for DOM-bearing samples to those for DOM-free controls at the same pH and IS. While nano-TiO2 aggregation behaviors varied widely in response to pH, IS, and DOM concentration, suspensions exposed to either SRFA or bacterial exudate at DOC-normalized concentrations exhibited remarkably similar sedimentation rates in approximately half of all solution conditions. In the remaining treatments, nano-TiO2 aggregates exhibited slightly higher sedimentation rates when exposed to bacterial exudates, relative to SRFA. In high IS treatments, nano-TiO2 exposed to either SRFA or bacterial exudate generally sedimented rapidly, except in the presence of relatively high DOC concentrations at pH 6 and 7.5. Low IS treatments exhibited a much larger range of effects. In fact, relative to DOM-free controls, sedimentation rates for nano-TiO2 aggregates in SRFA and bacterial exudate exposures were up to 14 times faster at pH 3, and up to 14 times slower at pH 7.5. This pH-dependent aggregation behavior at low IS in the presence of DOM represents a complete reversal of the aggregation behavior for DOM-free control samples, where nano-TiO2 suspensions sedimented slowly at pH 3 and quickly at pH 7.5. Collectively, these data suggest that DOM origin and concentration, as well as solution pH and IS, may control the fate and mobility of nano-TiO2 in geologic systems.