CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 9
Presentation Time: 11:00 AM

TIME LAPSE SEISMIC RESPONSE (4D) RELATED TO INDUSTRIAL-SCALE CO2 INJECTION AT AN EOR AND CCS SITE, CRANFIELD, MS


DITKOF, Julie, Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas-Austin, University Station, Box X, Austin, TX 78713, MECKEL, Timothy A., Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, Univ Texas at Austin, University Station, PO Box X, Austin, TX 78713, ZENG, Hongliu, Bureau of Economic Geology, John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 10100 Burnet Rd, Bldg130, Austin, TX 78758 and HOVORKA, Susan D., Gulf Coast Carbon Center, Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, University Station, Box X, Austin, TX 78713, Ditkof.1@gmail.com

Reservoir fluid substitution is critical for understanding 4D seismic response. Time lapse seismic surveys have been conducted internationally at well-known field sites like Otway, Weyburn, and Sleipner as well as downhole measurements at Frio and Cranfield in the United States. This project, however, is the first 4D survey conducted in the U.S. for CCS purposes. Continuous CO2 injection has occurred at an EOR project in Mississippi since 2008, also the location of our SECARB CCS demonstration project funded by DOE’s Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership. 4D response has been characterized after 3 years of injection, where >3 million tons of CO2 remain in the subsurface. Results show a definitive but complicated CO2 response in the injection interval, and no coherent response above or below the injection interval. To further quantify the seismic response, well log data show that Vp decreases before becoming mostly constant, Vs increases linearly, and density slightly decreases in the injection zone. Some areas that have received CO2 do not have coherent seismic response, indicating that 4D response to injected CO2 in some parts of the field is masked by residual oil, gas, and brine related to historic production (1960’s). Forward modeling and flow simulation are integrated to understand seismic response in relation to fluid properties and distribution. These results support seismic for reducing CCS risks such as in and out of zone migration and sweep efficiency while benefitting EOR understanding.
Meeting Home page GSA Home Page