SIMPLIFYING COMPLEXITY--COMPARISON OF PARTICLE AND GRID METHODS WITH COARSE GRIDS
Both advective transport methods have inaccuracies. Advective grid methods on coarse grids are inaccurate because of numerical dispersion. Advective particle-tracking methods on coarse grids are inaccurate because concentration will vary on a much finer scale than simulated groundwater velocity. Also, on a coarse grid, there is no mixing of convergent path lines near pumping wells. In this study, a velocity refinement technique is used to simulate radial flow toward a pumping well to more accurately represent path lines near wells.
A component of optimal nonlinear regression parameter estimates is related to method inaccuracy. For example, in the grid method, parameters of mass transfer in dual- porosity-domain medium are estimated, but the estimates may include compensation for numerical dispersion. We compare the effect of numerical method on predicted values and prediction uncertainty. Because of inaccuracy of methods on coarse grids, predictions of trends may not be reliable. We present a simpler method in which each solute source is represented by a hypothetical solute with source strength of unity. Breakthrough curves at observed trend locations show the pattern of source mixing has changed over time. This approach helps explain observed trends in water quality in the basin and is less reliant on the choice of numerical methods.