CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 6
Presentation Time: 9:00 AM-6:00 PM

MAFIC ROCK GEOCHEMISTRY AS A TOOL TO CONSTRAIN CENTRAL BLUE RIDGE TERRANES IN WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA


PETERSON, Virginia L., Geology Department, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401, RYAN, Jeffrey G., Department of Geology, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Ave., SCA 528, Tampa, FL 33620-5201 and COLLINS, Nathan C., Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lehigh University, 1 West Packer Ave, Bethlehem, PA 18015-3001, petersvi@gvsu.edu

Terrane analysis provides an important framework for tectonic interpretations of the southern Appalachian Blue Ridge (BR). Lithotectonic terranes within the Western (WBR), Central (CBR), and Eastern Blue Ridge (EBR) provinces have been defined using litho-stratigraphic mapping and structural analysis; age determinations of plutonic rocks and detrital grains in metasediments; and metamorphic ages. Challenges in terrane analysis, particularly in the CBR, include complex deformation and amphibolite-granulite grade metamorphism with variable migmatization; lack of fossils; and olistostromes, interpreted by some as accretionary block-in-matrix sequences, that complicate stratigraphic correlations. In modern environments, mafic rock geochemistry is a critical means of distinguishing tectonic setting. We suggest that mafic rock geochemistry can also be a powerful tool for distinguishing among CBR terranes.

We have conducted major, trace, and rare earth element (REE) analyses of amphibolites and other mafic rocks from the Cartoogechaye terrane (CT) and Mars Hill terrane (MHT) of the CBR. We compare our data to published results for amphibolitic rocks from across the BR, and from the Bakersville metagabbro dikes. WBR mafic rocks are geochemically quite uniform, while EBR mafic rocks vary widely. CBR mafic rocks display two fairly distinct geochemical “fingerprints”. Rocks from the southern CT and northern Cowrock (CR) terrane in SW NC, south of the Trimont Ridge complex, display tholeiitic trends, relatively high V/Ti, and LREE depleted rare earth patterns consistent with formation in a mid-ocean ridge setting On an MgO vs. Al2O3 plot most fall within or near a delineated “cumulate triangle,” suggesting cumulate mafic protoliths, and many preserve field and petrologic characteristics of cumulates. MHT and northern CT amphibolites follow calc-alkaline trajectories, have low V/Ti and REE patterns more typical of arc settings, and cluster tightly outside the “cumulate triangle” in MgO vs. Al2O3 space. Our data from entrained mafic assemblages points to the possibility of a boundary within the CT near Trimont Ridge, and the potential utility of using geochemistry to distinguish more finely among BR terranes.

Meeting Home page GSA Home Page