CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 12
Presentation Time: 11:30 AM

PILOT STUDY TO EVALUATE HYDROGEN INJECTION FOR STIMULATING REDUCTION AND IMMOBILIZATION OF URANIUM IN GROUNDWATER AT AN ISR MINING SITE


CABEZAS, Jose, CLAPP, Lee W. and GAMBOA, Yaneth, Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, 917 W Avenue B, MSC 213, Kingsville, TX 78363, lee.clapp@tamuk.edu

State and federal regulations require that groundwater at in-situ recovery (ISR) uranium mining operations be restored to pre-mining conditions. Industry-accepted groundwater restoration technologies such as reverse osmosis filtration require treatment of large amounts of water and may take several years to achieve restoration goals, and in some cases pre-mining conditions cannot be reached. In-situ biostimulation of indigenous iron- and sulfate reducing bacteria by injection of organic electron donors (e.g., ethanol, acetate, and lactate) to promote soluble uranium reduction and immobilization has been the subject of previous studies. However, injection of organic substrates has been observed to cause aquifer clogging near the injection point. In addition, U(VI) solubility may be enhanced through complexation with carbonate generated by organic carbon oxidation. An alternative approach that may overcome these problems involves the use of hydrogen as a reductant to promote microbial reduction and immobilization of U(VI) in situ. To test this approach, approximately 100,000 scf of compressed hydrogen gas was injected into a leached unconsolidated sand zone over two months at an ISR mining site. During this time groundwater was recirculated between injection and extraction wells (separated by 130 ft) at a rate of about 40 gpm and bromide was coinjected as a conservative tracer. A well monitoring program has been executed since June 2009 to evaluate the performance of the hydrogen injection. Current results show that U(VI) has been reduced from 4.2 to 0.05 ppm in the area surrounding the injection well and to 2.0 ± 0.3 ppm in the area surrounding the extraction well and two intermediate monitoring wells. Other water quality changes near the injection well include significant decreases in concentrations of Mo, sulfate, Fe, Mn, bicarbonate, Ca, and Eh, and increases in pH, methane, and sulfide. No significant rebound of soluble uranium concentrations was observed, but significant rebounds in molybdenum and sulfate have been observed. Ongoing studies are evaluating the effective zone of influence of the hydrogen injection.
Meeting Home page GSA Home Page