CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 2
Presentation Time: 8:30 AM

ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MACROEVOLUTIONARY TRAJECTORIES OF PHENOTYPIC INTEGRATION AND MORPHOLOGICAL DISPARITY


GERBER, Sylvain, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, The University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, England and EBLE, Gunther J., Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 5561 Biogeosciences, University of Burgundy, 6 Boulevard Gabriel, Dijon, 21000, France, s.gerber@bath.ac.uk

Heterogeneous patterning is often documented as a prominent feature of morphospace in macroevolutionary studies of phenotypic change. The temporal unfolding of morphospace, as revealed by measures of morphological disparity, may variously be the expression of functional factors, developmental constraints, or historical contingencies influencing the evolutionary dynamics of clades.

Although morphospace analysis has been focused mostly on temporal variations in the extent of morphospace realized (the magnitude of disparity), morphological disparity itself also has an underlying structure. Disparity potentially reflects aspects of the hierarchical organization of phenotypes into quasi-independent units of evolutionary transformation. In this context, how phenotypic integration and modularity may actually relate with morphological disparity is an important but still largely unexplored question. For instance, might changes in morphological disparity characteristically result from the interplay of parcellation and integration of phenotype organization? Or might they result instead from intrinsic changes in the variational potential of a relatively constant number of modules? When are integration and disparity likely to correlate? Analogously, might disparity be operationally used as a meaningful proxy for modularity?

Here, we address such questions by explicitly quantifying temporal trajectories of clade-wide measures of phenotypic integration. We explore a few summary statistics of phenotypic correlation and covariance structure as a means of portraying macroevolutionary patterns of integration and their contrast with disparity profiles. These questions and methodological approaches are illustrated with analyses of a few major echinoderm clades with putatively distinct modular organizations. Our results suggest that qualitatively different, context-dependent relationships between disparity and integration can be envisioned, calling for a broader array of causal interpretations.

Meeting Home page GSA Home Page