IDENTIFYING AND EXAMINING POTENTIAL GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES IN NON-TRADITIONAL REGIONS, EXAMPLES FROM THE NORTHEASTERN U.S
Heat production is calculated from the measured density of the samples, the concentrations of K, U, and Th from whole-rock geochemical analysis via X-ray fluorescence, and established radiogenic heat production values. Models for a particular area can then be generated by calculating depth-specific temperatures using heat production, measured thermal conductivity for each sample, and assumptions related to local stratigraphy and regional heat flow. Mapping and structural extrapolation are used to establish the subsurface characteristics at a study site and are combined with the thermal and chemical characteristics of contact rocks and overburden materials.
Two examples of the application of this technique are the Fall River granite at the margin of the Narragansett Basin in southeastern Massachusetts and the Andover granite in northeastern Massachusetts. Thermal models of the Fall River pluton indicate average temperatures of 71°C at depths of 4 km and 97°C at 6 km. Average temperatures increase to 107°C and 132°C, respectively, when a 2 km thick sediment package is modeled overlying the granite. The Andover granite, which is not associated with a sedimentary basin and is in a more structurally complex configuration, yields an average temperature of 74°C at a depth of 4 km and 101°C at 6 km. While this approach to modeling temperature-depth profiles requires some regional heat flow assumptions, the application of mapping and structural analysis with geochemistry and thermal conductivity studies can be an important reconnaissance tool for identifying non-traditional geothermal resources.