CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 3
Presentation Time: 2:20 PM

RADIUM ISOTOPE RESPONSE TO AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY: EXAMPLE OF A MINNESOTA SANDSTONE AQUIFER


ABSTRACT WITHDRAWN

, dsv3@duke.edu

Radium (Ra) differs from other trace elements of health significance (e.g. As) by its behavior represented by a balance of physical (alpha recoil) and chemical (e.g. adsorption) processes. To evaluate the practicality of aquifer storage and recovery in the Cambrian Mt. Simon sandstone aquifer of Minnesota, an aquifer that naturally yields levels of radium often requiring treatment prior to use, a pilot injection study was conducted on behalf of three cooperating cities in the northwest Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Here we report results of a supplemental radium investigation conducted in logistical coordination with the pilot study. 63 × 106 gal (2.4 × 105 m3) of groundwater from other sources were injected over ~4.5 months and stored for ~3 months after the end of injection. Subsequent recovery of 52 × 106 gal (2.0 × 105 m3) over ~2 months resulted in total storage time of 3-9 months. The recovered water resembled the injected water in terms of nonreactive ions such as Cl-, which implies that only minor mixing of native groundwater with injected water occurred. However, the radium content of the recovered water exceeded what would be expected from mixing of injected water (226Ra+228Ra < 2 pCi/L) with native groundwater (226Ra+228Ra > 6 pCi/L). During recovery, short-lived 224Ra activity stabilized within hours, whereas long-lived 226Ra and 228Ra increased gradually for two months (0.7-2.2 and 1.0-2.3 pCi/L, respectively), approaching the maximum contaminant level of 5 pCi/L 226Ra+228Ra. The rapid increase of 224Ra, and 224Ra/228Ra ratios >1 after the first two hours (1.5-2.6), are consistent with alpha recoil (release of Ra from the α-decay of solid-phase Th) as a major Ra-releasing mechanism because 224Ra is replaced more rapidly than the longer-lived 228Ra. Decreasing 228Ra/226Ra during recovery (1.8-1.0) could be interpreted as a recoil effect due to half-life differences and/or as an indicator of mixing between injected water and native groundwater. Overall, activities of 226Ra and 228Ra in recovered water are influenced by alpha recoil during storage and/or mixing of high-Ra native groundwater into the injected water. These results imply that longer storage duration than documented here may yield higher levels of 226Ra+228Ra in recovered water.
Meeting Home page GSA Home Page