CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 5
Presentation Time: 2:30 PM

MESSENGER: IMPLICATIONS FOR MERCURY FORMATION HYPOTHESES


EBEL, Denton S., Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St, New York, NY 10024, ALEXANDER, Conel M. O'D., Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC 20015, HAUCK II, Steven A., Department of Geological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, AW Smith 112, Cleveland, OH 44106-7216, LAWRENCE, David J., Space Department, Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723, NITTLER, Larry R., Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5241 Broad Branch Rd NW, Washington, DC 20015, PEPLOWSKI, Patrick, Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723, SOLOMON, Sean C., Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5241 Broad Branch Rd. NW, Washington, DC 20015, SPRAGUE, Ann L., Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, STARR, Richard D., Physics Department, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064 and STEWART, Sarah T., Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, 20 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, Debel@amnh.org

The MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) mission has characterized the surface abundances of major elements and the ratios K/Th and K/U in surface rocks. One of the goals of the MESSENGER mission has been to test, by measurement of surface composition, hypotheses advanced to account for Mercury’s anomalously large core mass fraction (~65%) compared to those for Earth and Venus (~30%). One set of hypotheses requires primary chemical or mechanical fractionation of metal and silicates in the high-temperature inner annulus of the solar system's nebular disk where Mercury accreted. Another hypothesis calls for the catastrophic loss of the earliest crust and a substantial fraction of the mantle in a high-velocity impact by a planetary-embryo-sized body of unknown composition. MESSENGER's Gamma-Ray Spectrometer and X-Ray Spectrometer, respectively, indicate terrestrial K/Th abundance ratios and high S/Si ratios. Mercury is thus richer in volatiles than expected for some models, and may have a higher bulk S/Si ratio than Earth. Models for crust and mantle removal do not necessarily result in volatile depletion in what remains of the target body; the proposed catastrophic impact model for Mercury is less fractionating of volatiles than the Moon’s likely origin via accretion within a volatile-depleted disk of ejected material. Enrichment of S in Mercury (relative to Earth), however, points to initial accretion chemistry. Sulfur enrichment may have resulted from highly reduced accretion conditions, consistent with disk mid-plane enrichment in C-rich interplanetary dust. In a reduced, differentiating body, incorporation of Si in the core would decrease core incorporation of S. Observed correlations of Mg/Si and Ca/Si with S/Si may be due to the stability of Mg and Ca sulfides in a reducing mantle. MESSENGER’s orbital geochemical, geological, geophysical, plasma science, and other results constitute a diverse set of observations demanding explanation.
Meeting Home page GSA Home Page