CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 10
Presentation Time: 4:15 PM

NEW APPLICATION OF MANGANESE OXIDE MINERALIZATION AS A PATHFINDER TO MAGMATIC-HYDROTHERMAL SULFIDE MINERALIZATION


LUETH, Virgil W., New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Tech, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801, PETERS, Lisa, New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 and CASEY, Heather, Dept. Earth & Env. Science, New Mexico Tech, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801, vwlueth@nmt.edu

Manganese oxide (MnOx) mineralization has long been considered a distal manifestation of larger magmatic-hydrothermal systems. A complex MnOx mineralogy is thought to reflect the sulfide ore chemistry and consists of the minerals hollandite (Ba), chalcophanite (Zn), coronadite (Pb), todorokite (Ag), and others. Recognition of this manganese assemblage has been used to direct exploration in many mining districts.

Three mining districts that contain both sulfide and complex MnOx deposits were studied to evaluate the mineralogical and temporal relationships of these two types of mineralization. These districts included: Magdalena (NM), Lake Valley (NM), and Santa Eulalia (Chihuahua, Mexico). All districts displayed similar manganese mineral assemblages. Detailed study of the MnOx paragenesis was essential for locating datable K-bearing minerals; found most commonly at the transition of Mn oxide mineralization to calcite precipitation. Age dating of the MnOx mineralization was accomplished by 40Ar/39Ar dating of minerals from the coronadite group, specifically the K-bearing phases, cryptomelane and todorokite.

In none of the districts studied did the age of MnOx mineralization correlate to the age of igneous rocks associated with sulfide mineralization. In most cases, the manganese oxides were more than 10 million years younger than the inferred ages of the sulfide ores (sulfide age/MnOx age): Magdalena (28-29 Ma/8-14 Ma), Lake Valley (28-35 Ma/14 Ma), Santa Eulalia (33 Ma/ 2-10 Ma). Obviously the MnOx deposits are produced by a process independent of the magmatic-hydrothermal system. A broad survey of MnOx deposits suggests weathering or remobilization of metals by younger hydrothermal or groundwater systems could to be responsible for observed MnOx mineralization. Although temporally unrelated, the geologic relationships and proximity of MnOx to sulfide mineralization suggest they can be used for exploration; albeit using a different geological paradigm than has been employed historically.

Meeting Home page GSA Home Page