GEOPHOTOGRAPHY AS A SUBFIELD WITHIN THE GEOSCIENCES
Reasons for recognizing and fostering the subfield of geophotography include 1) geoscientists visit and study earth’s most spectacular features, but are commonly disappointed by their photographs; 2) the explosion in the variety and capability of photographic equipment, techniques, and software has in many ways made it more challenging to obtain the highest quality results; 3) the rapid development of techniques that produce images or sets of images similar to photographs, which presently share no common umbrella; and 4) identification and promotion of techniques and equipment specific to geophotographers.
I propose this initial definition: Geophotography involves realistic recording (commonly using visible light, UV, or IR radiation) and processing of images of geologic features and processes or their experimental equivalents, motivated by a scientific understanding or question, in order to accomplish a specific, useful goal. Thus, the geophotographer has some scientific understanding of (or at least a question about) the subject, a specific reason for the exercise (research, education, or sharing with the public), and captures and processes the image in a way that does not significantly alter the realism of the image.
Many existing practices and techniques can be collected under the rubric of geophotography: mineral specimen photography, photogrammetry, repeat photography, time-lapse photography, photomicroscopy, panorama photography, field geophotography, paleontological photography, etc.