FOSSIL SPECIES: PLAY THE HAND YOU'VE BEEN DEALT
Coyne and Orr (2004, p. 26) argue that when choosing a species concept, “one should first identify the nature of one’s species ‘problem’, and then choose the concept best at solving that problem.” For a paleontologist interested in species formation, this means: 1) accepting that morphospecies are an imperfect but generally good guide to something like the Biological Species Concept, which itself works reasonably well for sexually-reproducing animals, 2) appreciating that a paleontologist has a variety of tools at his/her disposal to augment morphological information (e.g. geographic and stratigraphic ranges, paleoecology), and 3) appreciating that detailed, long-term patterns of morphologic stability and change are as essential to understanding the nature of species as are genetic or ecological data.
Data suitable for illuminating long-term patterns of evolution within a fossil species are unavailable in a great many cases, but well-chosen species-level taxa are arguably less problematic than fossil taxa of higher rank. The reproductive compatibility of living species confers on them a reality that other groups lack. Observing how this dynamic plays out over space and long intervals of time, through the proxy of paleomorphospecies, is necessary for a fully realized understanding of these most compelling evolutionary units.