CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 7
Presentation Time: 10:30 AM

DIMENSIONAL AND SPATIAL PATTERNS OF DISRUPTED BLOCKS OF MESSINIAN GYPSUM, WESTERN CALTANISSETTA BASIN, SICILY


THRESS, Ryan J., Department of Earth & Space Sciences, University of Washington, 4000 15th Avenue NE, Seattle, WA 98103, rthress@gmail.com

Chaotic mass-flow deposition is common along both active and passive margins; however, limited information about the internal structure and stratigraphy is available for these submarine deposits. The exhumed Late-Miocene Sicilian foredeep basin provides an accessible on-shore record of this mass-wasting process.

Evaporites associated with the Messinian Salinity Crisis are widespread throughout the Mediterranean region. The Sicilian Messinian stratigraphy is composed of two evaporitic units. The lower of these, (Lower Gypsum (LG)), includes both shallow-water, Primary Lower Gypsum (PLG) and deep-water, Resedimented Lower Gypsum (RLG). In the western Caltanissetta Basin, the RLG includes chaotic, non-bedded bodies containing disarticulated cm- to km-blocks of massive selenite gypsum, bedded gypsum mass-flows, and gypsum turbidites. The resedimented components were derived from the dismantlement of PLG along basin margins. Previous studies suggest that major sections of the PLG, both in the northern Apennines and Sicily, underwent large-scale mass-wasting processes and that the chaotic bodies in the RLG are gravitationally driven mass-flow deposits (olistostromes). The olistoliths within the RLG have a well-defined stratigraphy that can be correlated back to in-place sections. We investigated the distribution of these blocks to reveal the deposit’s internal structure and possible block emplacement mechanisms. Field mapping and satellite imagery were used to map the size, shape, and block distribution in order to establish dimensional and spatial patterns of block disruption. The stratigraphy and orientation of each major block was also determined to estimate dispersal patterns and possible temporal or stratigraphic sub-groupings. On the basis of work to date, we hypothesize that the blocks slid out onto the basin floor and were buried by younger, deep-water sediments, which are now being eroded to exhume original seafloor topography created by the emplaced blocks.

Meeting Home page GSA Home Page