CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 10
Presentation Time: 4:15 PM

ADVANCES IN EPIKARST ZONE HYDROGEOLOGY IN THE PENNYROYAL PLATEAU OF SOUTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY: IMPLICATIONS FOR CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT


POLK, Jason1, GROVES, Chris2, HAAFF, Benjamin1, MILLER, Benjamin V.3 and VANDERHOFF, Sean4, (1)Hoffman Environmental Research Institute, Dept. of Geography and Geology, Western Kentucky University, 1906 College Heights Blvd, EST 428, Bowling Green, KY 42101, (2)Western Kentucky University, Hoffman Environmental Research Institute, 1906 College Heights Blvd, Bowling Green, KY 42101, (3)Geography & Geology, Western Kentucky University, 1906 College Heights Blvd, Bowling Green, KY 42101, (4)Hoffman Environmental Research Institute, Western Kentucky University, Department of Geography and Geology, 1906 College Heights Blvd. #31066, Bowling Green, KY 42101, jason.polk@wku.edu

The movement of autogenic recharge through the shallow epikarstic zone in soil-mantled karst aquifers is important in understanding recharge areas and rates, storage, and contaminant transport processes. To understand the storage and flow of autogenic recharge flowing to a single epikarst drain in Crump’s Cave on Kentucky’s Mississippian Plateau, we employed two methods. First, we performed base flow separation of eleven discrete storms, where stormflow was integrated to measure individual storm volumes, and a nominal recharge area parameter ζ was determined for each by setting the storm surface recharge and drainage volumes equal and then dividing the resulting recharge volume by the presumably uniform measured rainfall depth.

Values of ζ range from 843 m2 to 11,200 m2, with lower values likely resulting from water entering epikarst storage that does not reach the drain during that storm response. Values of ζ may thus provide way to quantify varying epikarst storage input. Data also suggest that the actual recharge area is on the order of 100x100 m. Using between-storm baseflow discharges and individual values of ζ , we calculated unit-baseflow (UBF--baseflow discharge per unit recharge area), and show that calculated values for the epikarst drain are 2-3 orders of magnitude higher than published UBF values for regional springs. This gives quantitative evidence that storage is more concentrated in the epikarst than the regional aquifer as a whole.

A second independent proxy of recharge and epikarst storage conditions from isotopic analysis of precipitation and epikarst water supports this finding. Rainfall amounts above the cave and discharge of the water flowing from the drain below were measured every ten minutes in 2010-11. Weekly precipitation and cave waterfall samples were collected for stable isotope (O and H) analysis, with higher resolution sampling of the waterfall during storm events. Precipitation isotope δ18O values ranged from -5.7 to -16‰, while the cave waterfall δ18O values averaged -6.3‰ (ranging between -5.2 to -7.3‰), indicating that despite intense storm events with highly variable δ18O values, a rapid homogenization of meteoric recharge water with epikarst storage water occurs in the system, further supporting that substantial storage occurs in the epikarst zone through diffuse flowpaths.

Meeting Home page GSA Home Page