|Northeastern (46th Annual) and North-Central (45th Annual) Joint Meeting (20–22 March 2011)|
|Paper No. 22-14|
|Presentation Time: 1:30 PM-5:30 PM|
PROGRESS REPORT ON GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF A (PROBABLE) IMPACT CRATER CONCEALED BY GLACIAL SEDIMENTS, LIBERTY TOWNSHIP, SENECA COUNTY, OHIO
BANASZAK, Joel F., Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Toledo, MS 604, Toledo, OH 43606, firstname.lastname@example.org, ARDNER, Jacob, Department of Environmental Sciences, The University of Toledo, MS 604, Toledo, OH 43606, and STIERMAN, Donald J., Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Toledo, 2801 West Bancroft Street MS604, Toledo, OH 43606|
A newly acquired 28-channel automated switchbox and cable deployed with AGI’s SuperSting R1IP has significantly increased the efficiency of collecting electrical resistivity data useful in mapping a suspected impact crater site. Bedrock is concealed by ~10 m of glacial sediments that lies mostly under fields inaccessible to geophysicists when muddy or when planted in row crops. Post-harvest expeditions in 2009 and 2010 collected a 680 m long dipole-dipole profile (a = 10 m) crossing the southeast edge of the crater and a 410 m long dipole-dipole profile crossing the south edge. Results support our hypothesis that 100 m of Lockport Dolomite (Silurian), documented in nearby water wells and oil exploration boreholes is missing not only from the crater proper, but also from up to 100 m outside the crater. We think the top of bedrock between the crater edge and the surrounding dolomite consists of the Rochester Formation and Cabot Head Formation, units identified directly under the Lockport Group in a continuously cored borehole (Wickstrom et al., 1985) 6 km to the east. These units, which include layers of green plastic shale, were uplifted by the event that formed this crater. Shale collected in cuttings from a 30 m deep borehole drilled northwest of the crater provides direct evidence of at least 70 m uplift. Although 7 of the 8 electrical resistivity surveys conducted in search of the crater edge show abrupt lateral changes consistent with a circular feature 980 m in diameter, these lateral resistivity contrasts are not the same. Electrical resistivities of crater fill range from under 10 Ω-m to over 100 Ω-m, and electrical resistivities of the country rock adjacent to the crater range from 40 Ω-m to over 1000 Ω-m. Wide variation in the properties of crater fill, coupled with the likelihood that Paleozoic shale rims sections of the crater, explains why most prior geophysical measurements were unable to tightly constrain the crater edge.
Northeastern (46th Annual) and North-Central (45th Annual) Joint Meeting (20–22 March 2011)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 22--Booth# 21|
Omni William Penn Hotel: Grand Ballroom/Urban Room
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Sunday, 20 March 2011
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 43, No. 1, p. 84
© Copyright 2011 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.