Rocky Mountain (63rd Annual) and Cordilleran (107th Annual) Joint Meeting (18–20 May 2011)

Paper No. 6
Presentation Time: 10:15 AM

SUBSURFACE EVIDENCE FOR LAKE BONNEVILLE FLUCTUATIONS NEAR LITTLE GRANITE MOUNTAIN, DUGWAY PROVING GROUND, UT


WAKELEY, Lillian D.1, BROADFOOT, Seth W.1, KELLEY, Julie R.1, METHENY, Owen M.1, PARKMAN, Kevin B.1, MCKENNA, Jason R.1 and BERRY, Thomas E.2, (1)U.S. Army Engineer Research & Development Center, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory, Vicksburg, MS 39180, (2)U.S. Army Engineer Research & Development Center, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Environmental Laboratory, Vicksburg, MS 39180, Lillian.D.Wakeley@usace.army.mil

Soil materials at a site in the east-central area of Dugway Proving Ground (DPG) were sampled and described during October 2010. The study centered on two pits 280 m apart excavated to a depth of > 6m. Project schedule and safety issues limited field operations to a total of four days, after which the pits were backfilled. The team collected minimally disturbed samples at 20-cm intervals in density-drive cylinders. Field activities also included stratigraphic description, measurement of magnetic susceptibility, and determination of in situ moisture and density. Sediments observed in the study area were interpreted as fine-grained lacustrine and shoreline deposits representing a shallow arm of Lake Bonneville, as well as related alluvial-fan and windblown deposits. Sediment sources were the mountains surrounding the study area: Davis and Little Davis Mountain to the south and southeast; Cedar Mountains to the north, northeast, and northwest; and Little Granite Mountain to the West. Field observations and subsequent laboratory analyses – including grain-size analyses, density, porosity, and saturated hydraulic conductivity – revealed evidence of at least two periods of lacustrine deposition punctuated by subaerial exposure and soil formation. Geophysical surveys, conducted prior to excavation using two electromagnetic-resistivity instruments, provided additional subsurface data. Field and laboratory data contributed to a 3-dimensional model of the site, built using a geologic-conceptual-model option within the Department of Defense Groundwater Modeling System software.