|Southeastern Section - 60th Annual Meeting (23–25 March 2011)|
|Paper No. 31-6|
|Presentation Time: 1:30 PM-5:30 PM|
QUANTIFYING THE THREAT TO ARCHAEOLOGICAL, HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES FROM SHORELINE CHANGE: THE GEORGIA COAST EXAMPLE
VENHERM, Claudia1, ALEXANDER, Clark1, MCCABE, Chris2, PÉREZ-SÁNCHEZ, Naomy1, JACKSON, Chester W. Jr3, CRASS, David2, and ROBINSON, Mike1, (1) Skidaway Institute of Oceanography, 10 Ocean Science Circle, Savannah, GA 31411, firstname.lastname@example.org, (2) Historic Preservation Division, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Atlanta, GA 30334, (3) Department of Geology and Geography, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30460|
Coastal Georgia is a dynamic environment. Frequently, shoreline erosion along open coastlines and bluffs of tidal streams impacts important archaeological sites by exposing, removing and destroying burials, structures, and artifacts. In this study we identified sites on barrier islands and back-barrier islands (“marsh hammocks”) in coastal Georgia that are threatened and/or are being damaged by coastal erosion, evaluated their site condition and prioritized them based on the order of site loss.
All archaeological sites within a 30 m radius of a waterway or marsh environment were selected from the Georgia Archaeological Site file (GASF) database, as these were the sites that might be destroyed within the next 50 years, based on average back-barrier erosion rates. This list was evaluated by the Georgia Department of Natural Resources – Historic Resources Division (DNR-HPD) to identify sites that were potentially listable on the Federal Register of Historic Places. For each of the identified sites, individual GIS projects were generated in ARCGIS 9.3 that included a current, GPS-surveyed shoreline and shorelines derived from historic maps and aerial imagery. AMBUR (Analysis of Moving Boundaries Using “R”) was then used to calculate shoreline change rates. Using these site-specific rates, we created a prioritized list of archaeological sites based on the time until the site was destroyed by erosion and the information contained within them was lost.
For the 21 selected sites on barrier islands, 11 shorelines (52%) were eroding, 8 were stable, and 2 were accreting. For the 36 selected sites on back-barrier islands, 29 shorelines (81%) were eroding, and 7 were stable. Higher shoreline change rates were observed at barrier island sites (up to -1.68 m/y erosion) when compared to back-barrier island sites (rates up to -0.72 m/y erosion), although the dynamic back-barrier environment exhibited a higher percentage of erosional sites. Consequently, archaeological sites on barrier islands experience a higher annual percentage loss of site information than sites on back-barrier islands. The projected lifetime of sites varies greatly, ranging from less than a year (and some sites had completely eroded away at the time of our survey) to several hundred years depending on shoreline change rate, site location and site size.
Southeastern Section - 60th Annual Meeting (23–25 March 2011)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 31--Booth# 27|
Remote Sensing/Geographic Information Systems (Posters)
Wilmington Convention Center: Exhibit Hall
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Friday, 25 March 2011
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 43, No. 2, p. 92
© Copyright 2011 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.