Southeastern Section - 60th Annual Meeting (23–25 March 2011)

Paper No. 6
Presentation Time: 1:30 PM-5:30 PM


VENHERM, Claudia1, ALEXANDER, Clark1, MCCABE, Chris2, PÉREZ-SÁNCHEZ, Naomy1, JACKSON Jr., Chester W.3, CRASS, David2 and ROBINSON, Mike1, (1)Skidaway Institute of Oceanography, 10 Ocean Science Circle, Savannah, GA 31411, (2)Historic Preservation Division, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Atlanta, GA 30334, (3)Department of Geology and Geography, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30460,

Coastal Georgia is a dynamic environment. Frequently, shoreline erosion along open coastlines and bluffs of tidal streams impacts important archaeological sites by exposing, removing and destroying burials, structures, and artifacts. In this study we identified sites on barrier islands and back-barrier islands (“marsh hammocks”) in coastal Georgia that are threatened and/or are being damaged by coastal erosion, evaluated their site condition and prioritized them based on the order of site loss.

All archaeological sites within a 30 m radius of a waterway or marsh environment were selected from the Georgia Archaeological Site file (GASF) database, as these were the sites that might be destroyed within the next 50 years, based on average back-barrier erosion rates. This list was evaluated by the Georgia Department of Natural Resources – Historic Resources Division (DNR-HPD) to identify sites that were potentially listable on the Federal Register of Historic Places. For each of the identified sites, individual GIS projects were generated in ARCGIS 9.3 that included a current, GPS-surveyed shoreline and shorelines derived from historic maps and aerial imagery. AMBUR (Analysis of Moving Boundaries Using “R”) was then used to calculate shoreline change rates. Using these site-specific rates, we created a prioritized list of archaeological sites based on the time until the site was destroyed by erosion and the information contained within them was lost.

For the 21 selected sites on barrier islands, 11 shorelines (52%) were eroding, 8 were stable, and 2 were accreting. For the 36 selected sites on back-barrier islands, 29 shorelines (81%) were eroding, and 7 were stable. Higher shoreline change rates were observed at barrier island sites (up to -1.68 m/y erosion) when compared to back-barrier island sites (rates up to -0.72 m/y erosion), although the dynamic back-barrier environment exhibited a higher percentage of erosional sites. Consequently, archaeological sites on barrier islands experience a higher annual percentage loss of site information than sites on back-barrier islands. The projected lifetime of sites varies greatly, ranging from less than a year (and some sites had completely eroded away at the time of our survey) to several hundred years depending on shoreline change rate, site location and site size.

  • 46x70_sgsa_postercv.pdf (1.1 MB)