PATTERNS OF ONLINE USE AND IMPROVED STUDENT PERFORMANCE WITH REPEATABLE ONLINE ASSESSMENTS
On average 72 of 88 students attempted seven quizzes 223 times and received an average score of 75%. This experience translated to better performance on the cumulative exams. Exam averages in earlier classes were consistently lower on the 2nd and 3rd exams.
INTRO GEOL |
exam 1 avg |
exam 2 avg |
exam 3 avg |
|
Fall 2010 |
80.3 |
79.4 |
80 |
Online quizzes |
N=88 |
|
|
|
|
Spring 2010 |
79.4 |
62.6 |
73.4 |
i>clicker |
N=43 |
|
|
|
|
Fall 2009 |
79.2 |
72.3 |
74.2 |
i>clicker |
N=76 |
|
|
|
|
Spring 2009 |
74 |
73.8 |
75.3 |
i>clicker |
N=87 |
|
|
|
|
Fall 2008 |
76 |
75.6 |
65.9 |
No i>clicker |
N=116 |
|
|
|
|
Results indicate improved student performance through summative assessments via Blackboard. This new assessment model required the same level of effort from the instructor to construct questions that assessed students’ conceptual and visual understanding of the content as was used with the earlier i>clicker method. To improve instructor efficiency, the quizzes were graded by Blackboard, which provided students with timely feedback upon submission. This determined if mastery of the material had been achieved, and/or if students would retake quizzes to enhance their learning. One of the major benefits to students was the ability to access material at times that best suit their study habits/preferences (24/7). This repetitive and expanded access is interpreted to have contributed to enhanced student understanding and improved their overall course performance.