A COMPARISON OF DISCHARGE AND BEDROCK GROUNDWATER HYDROGRAPHS BETWEEN CATCHMENTS UNDERLAIN BY SEDIMENTARY AND GRANITIC ROCKS
We studied the Shigaraki-catchment and the Fudoji catchment, which are underlain by sedimentary rock and granitic rock, respectively. The area of the sedimentary rock catchment was 0.896 ha, and that of the granitic rock catchment was 1.073 ha. In the sedimentary rock catchment, we excavated 12 boreholes to depths of 10 to 30 m. In the granitic rock catchment, we excavated 15 boreholes to depth of 10 to 36 m.
The discharge hydrograph from the sedimentary rock catchment had sharper peaks and more immediate declines than that from the granitic rock catchment. In both catchments, groundwater responses to rainfall events were relatively small in topographic hollows. In ridge areas, groundwater responses were larger in the sedimentary rock catchment than in the granitic rock catchment, which were comparable to the trends in the runoff hydrographs. The contours of the groundwater table suggested that ground water flows down to in a different direction to that indicated by the surface topography. In the granitic rock catchment, the contour is further apart than that in the sedimentary rock catchment. We concluded that, in the granitic rock catchment, the groundwater table was deep and unsaturated flow in thick weathered rock produced minimal responses in the groundwater hydrographs. In the sedimentary rock catchment, the groundwater table was shallow and its hydrograph responded sharply to rainfall, because of rapid water flow in rock fractures.